Working with difference

Cognitive schemas, ethical cosmopolitanism, and negotiating cultural diversity

Nina Høy-Petersen, Ian Woodward

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article empirically explores the types and limits of ethical varieties of cosmopolitan openness by analysing in-depth interviews with a sample of professionals and volunteers (N = 20) in culturally heterogeneous workplaces that are characterised by interpersonal interactions requiring intercultural competencies. It analyses the way people relax and harden the borders of openness around people, objects and practices they see as unfamiliar and different. Within the context of two primary schemes for deliberating the principles and schemas for acting in ways that are open to valuing difference, the article finds that the interviewees use flexible and contextually shifting categorisations of otherness and sameness that serve apparently conflicting agendas of ethical openness, self-protection, instrumentalism and parochialism. Exploring the schemas associated with these forms of everyday ethical understandings, the results show their cosmopolitan ethical practice to be performative and contextual, entangled with a variety of potentially conflicting schemas of evaluation and judgement.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Sociology
Volume33
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)655-673
ISSN0268-5809
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1. Nov 2018

Fingerprint

cosmopolitanism
cultural diversity
civil defense
foreignness
workplace
interaction
interview
evaluation

Keywords

  • Cosmopolitanism
  • helping relations
  • Intercultural competence
  • cultural diversity
  • ethics
  • cognitive schemas
  • cosmopolitanism
  • ethical cosmopolitanism
  • Cognitive schemas

Cite this

@article{a8b007d7b41e44a0aefc366c9b6b7db3,
title = "Working with difference: Cognitive schemas, ethical cosmopolitanism, and negotiating cultural diversity",
abstract = "This article empirically explores the types and limits of ethical varieties of cosmopolitan openness by analysing in-depth interviews with a sample of professionals and volunteers (N = 20) in culturally heterogeneous workplaces that are characterised by interpersonal interactions requiring intercultural competencies. It analyses the way people relax and harden the borders of openness around people, objects and practices they see as unfamiliar and different. Within the context of two primary schemes for deliberating the principles and schemas for acting in ways that are open to valuing difference, the article finds that the interviewees use flexible and contextually shifting categorisations of otherness and sameness that serve apparently conflicting agendas of ethical openness, self-protection, instrumentalism and parochialism. Exploring the schemas associated with these forms of everyday ethical understandings, the results show their cosmopolitan ethical practice to be performative and contextual, entangled with a variety of potentially conflicting schemas of evaluation and judgement.",
keywords = "Cosmopolitanism, helping relations, Intercultural competence, cultural diversity, ethics, cognitive schemas, cosmopolitanism, ethical cosmopolitanism, Cognitive schemas",
author = "Nina H{\o}y-Petersen and Ian Woodward",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0268580918792782",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "655--673",
journal = "International Sociology",
issn = "0268-5809",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "6",

}

Working with difference : Cognitive schemas, ethical cosmopolitanism, and negotiating cultural diversity . / Høy-Petersen, Nina; Woodward, Ian.

In: International Sociology, Vol. 33, No. 6, 01.11.2018, p. 655-673.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Working with difference

T2 - Cognitive schemas, ethical cosmopolitanism, and negotiating cultural diversity

AU - Høy-Petersen, Nina

AU - Woodward, Ian

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - This article empirically explores the types and limits of ethical varieties of cosmopolitan openness by analysing in-depth interviews with a sample of professionals and volunteers (N = 20) in culturally heterogeneous workplaces that are characterised by interpersonal interactions requiring intercultural competencies. It analyses the way people relax and harden the borders of openness around people, objects and practices they see as unfamiliar and different. Within the context of two primary schemes for deliberating the principles and schemas for acting in ways that are open to valuing difference, the article finds that the interviewees use flexible and contextually shifting categorisations of otherness and sameness that serve apparently conflicting agendas of ethical openness, self-protection, instrumentalism and parochialism. Exploring the schemas associated with these forms of everyday ethical understandings, the results show their cosmopolitan ethical practice to be performative and contextual, entangled with a variety of potentially conflicting schemas of evaluation and judgement.

AB - This article empirically explores the types and limits of ethical varieties of cosmopolitan openness by analysing in-depth interviews with a sample of professionals and volunteers (N = 20) in culturally heterogeneous workplaces that are characterised by interpersonal interactions requiring intercultural competencies. It analyses the way people relax and harden the borders of openness around people, objects and practices they see as unfamiliar and different. Within the context of two primary schemes for deliberating the principles and schemas for acting in ways that are open to valuing difference, the article finds that the interviewees use flexible and contextually shifting categorisations of otherness and sameness that serve apparently conflicting agendas of ethical openness, self-protection, instrumentalism and parochialism. Exploring the schemas associated with these forms of everyday ethical understandings, the results show their cosmopolitan ethical practice to be performative and contextual, entangled with a variety of potentially conflicting schemas of evaluation and judgement.

KW - Cosmopolitanism

KW - helping relations

KW - Intercultural competence

KW - cultural diversity

KW - ethics

KW - cognitive schemas

KW - cosmopolitanism

KW - ethical cosmopolitanism

KW - Cognitive schemas

U2 - 10.1177/0268580918792782

DO - 10.1177/0268580918792782

M3 - Journal article

VL - 33

SP - 655

EP - 673

JO - International Sociology

JF - International Sociology

SN - 0268-5809

IS - 6

ER -