Welfare reform, 1834: Did the New Poor Law in England produce significant economic gains?

Gregory Clark*, Marianne E. Page

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The English Old Poor Law, which before 1834 provided welfare to the elderly, children, the improvident, and the unfortunate, was a bête noire of the new discipline of Political Economy. Smith, Bentham, Malthus, and Ricardo all claimed it created significant social costs and increased rather than reduced poverty. The Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834, drafted by Political Economists, cuts payments sharply. Because local rules on eligibility and provision varied greatly before the 1834 reform, we can estimate the social costs of the extensive welfare provision of the Old Poor Law. Surprisingly there is no evidence of any of the alleged social costs that prompted the harsh treatment of the poor after 1834. Political economy, it seems, was born in sin.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCliometrica
Volume13
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)221-244
Number of pages24
ISSN1863-2505
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1. May 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords

  • Poverty
  • Welfare reform
  • Welfare systems
  • Work incentives

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Welfare reform, 1834: Did the New Poor Law in England produce significant economic gains?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this