Abstract
The English Old Poor Law, which before 1834 provided welfare to the elderly, children, the improvident, and the unfortunate, was a bête noire of the new discipline of Political Economy. Smith, Bentham, Malthus, and Ricardo all claimed it created significant social costs and increased rather than reduced poverty. The Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834, drafted by Political Economists, cuts payments sharply. Because local rules on eligibility and provision varied greatly before the 1834 reform, we can estimate the social costs of the extensive welfare provision of the Old Poor Law. Surprisingly there is no evidence of any of the alleged social costs that prompted the harsh treatment of the poor after 1834. Political economy, it seems, was born in sin.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Cliometrica |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 2 |
Pages (from-to) | 221-244 |
Number of pages | 24 |
ISSN | 1863-2505 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1. May 2019 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Keywords
- Poverty
- Welfare reform
- Welfare systems
- Work incentives