Abstract
Background: Geographical, financial and travel-related barriers may impact access to necessary health care for people in need of long-term follow-up. Objective: The goal of the research was to perform a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), healing, interaction, and satisfaction of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and PI receiving multidisciplinary videoconference consultations from a wound clinic to the participant's home versus regular outpatient care. The multidisciplinary team consisted of a medical doctor, a wound nurse, and an occupational therapist. In both groups, district nurses attended the consultations at the participant's home. Methods: A total of 56 participants, 28 in each group, were randomized to a videoconference group (VCG) or a regular care group (RCG). Validated questionnaires were used to measure and compare the follow-up effect on HRQoL. Percentage reduction of wound volume was measured at end of the follow-up. A Likert scale was used to measure the satisfaction of the patients and district nurses regarding the interaction between different modalities of care in the 2 groups. Results: The HRQoL did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (P values ranging from.09 to.88) or the rate of PI healing, experienced interaction, and satisfaction in the groups. A total of 67% (37/55) of all PIs healed, 64% (18/28) in the VCG and 70% (19/27) in the RCG. Mean reduction in ulcer volume was 79% in the VCG and 85% in the RCG (P = .32). A Kaplan-Meier plot with a logrank test regarding time to healing did not show any significant difference between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Videoconference-based care seems to be a safe and efficient way to manage PIs in terms of HRQoL, healing, interaction, and satisfaction compared to conventional care for people with SCI. This should be considered when planning for future care. SCI has a huge impact on the individual, the family, and the health care system. There is an urgent need to improve systems of care so that individuals who live far from specialists and require long-term follow-up for conditions such as PI can get optimal treatment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e27692 |
| Journal | JMIR Formative Research |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISSN | 2561-326X |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 19. Apr 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Ingebjørg Irgens, Jana Midelfart-Hoff, Rolf Jelnes, Marcalee Alexander, Johan Kvalvik Stanghelle, Magne Thoresen, Tiina Rekand.
Funding
The authors wish to thank specialized wound care nurses Hanne Haugland, Tori Lunde, and Irene Nærdal, occupational therapists Unn Svarverud and Gunnbjørg Aune, telemedicine consultant Hilde Sørli, participant in the project reference group Ingar K Bergersen, and participants from the Norwegian SCI Association, LARS, for collaboration in the project. The first author is funded by the DAM Foundation. The trial founder is Linda Åsheim, and she can be reached at [email protected]. The DAM Foundation has no influence on the trial protocol or the results.
Keywords
- healing
- health-related quality of life
- outpatient follow-up
- participant interaction
- participant satisfaction
- pressure injury
- spinal cord injury
- telecommunication
- telemedicine
- videoconference
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Videoconferencing in Pressure Injury: Randomized Controlled Telemedicine Trial in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver