Vectors

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article revisits the concept of vectors, which, in Kress and van Leeuwen’s Reading Images (2006), plays a crucial role in distinguishing between ‘narrative’, action-oriented processes and ‘conceptual’, state-oriented processes. The use of this concept in image analysis has usually focused on the most salient vectors, and this works well, but many images contain a plethora of vectors, which makes their structure quite different from the linguistic transitivity structures with which Kress and van Leeuwen have compared ‘narrative’ images. It can also be asked whether facial expression vectors should be taken into account in discussing ‘reactions’, which Kress and van Leeuwen link only to eyeline vectors. Finally, the question can be raised as to whether actions are always realized by vectors. Drawing on a re-reading of Rudolf Arnheim’s account of vectors, these issues are outlined, their consequences discussed, and ways forward suggested.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNew studies in multimodality : Conceptual and methodological elaborations
EditorsOgnyan Seizov, Janina Wildfeuer
PublisherBloomsbury Academic
Publication date2017
Chapter2
ISBN (Print)9781350026520
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Cite this

Boeriis, M., & van Leeuwen, T. (2017). Vectors. In O. Seizov, & J. Wildfeuer (Eds.), New studies in multimodality: Conceptual and methodological elaborations Bloomsbury Academic.
Boeriis, Morten ; van Leeuwen, Theo. / Vectors. New studies in multimodality: Conceptual and methodological elaborations. editor / Ognyan Seizov ; Janina Wildfeuer. Bloomsbury Academic, 2017.
@inbook{aa07bc8377e5477ab0e89162bdfd3c7d,
title = "Vectors",
abstract = "This article revisits the concept of vectors, which, in Kress and van Leeuwen’s Reading Images (2006), plays a crucial role in distinguishing between ‘narrative’, action-oriented processes and ‘conceptual’, state-oriented processes. The use of this concept in image analysis has usually focused on the most salient vectors, and this works well, but many images contain a plethora of vectors, which makes their structure quite different from the linguistic transitivity structures with which Kress and van Leeuwen have compared ‘narrative’ images. It can also be asked whether facial expression vectors should be taken into account in discussing ‘reactions’, which Kress and van Leeuwen link only to eyeline vectors. Finally, the question can be raised as to whether actions are always realized by vectors. Drawing on a re-reading of Rudolf Arnheim’s account of vectors, these issues are outlined, their consequences discussed, and ways forward suggested.",
author = "Morten Boeriis and {van Leeuwen}, Theo",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781350026520",
editor = "Ognyan Seizov and Janina Wildfeuer",
booktitle = "New studies in multimodality",
publisher = "Bloomsbury Academic",

}

Boeriis, M & van Leeuwen, T 2017, Vectors. in O Seizov & J Wildfeuer (eds), New studies in multimodality: Conceptual and methodological elaborations. Bloomsbury Academic.

Vectors. / Boeriis, Morten; van Leeuwen, Theo.

New studies in multimodality: Conceptual and methodological elaborations. ed. / Ognyan Seizov; Janina Wildfeuer. Bloomsbury Academic, 2017.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Vectors

AU - Boeriis, Morten

AU - van Leeuwen, Theo

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This article revisits the concept of vectors, which, in Kress and van Leeuwen’s Reading Images (2006), plays a crucial role in distinguishing between ‘narrative’, action-oriented processes and ‘conceptual’, state-oriented processes. The use of this concept in image analysis has usually focused on the most salient vectors, and this works well, but many images contain a plethora of vectors, which makes their structure quite different from the linguistic transitivity structures with which Kress and van Leeuwen have compared ‘narrative’ images. It can also be asked whether facial expression vectors should be taken into account in discussing ‘reactions’, which Kress and van Leeuwen link only to eyeline vectors. Finally, the question can be raised as to whether actions are always realized by vectors. Drawing on a re-reading of Rudolf Arnheim’s account of vectors, these issues are outlined, their consequences discussed, and ways forward suggested.

AB - This article revisits the concept of vectors, which, in Kress and van Leeuwen’s Reading Images (2006), plays a crucial role in distinguishing between ‘narrative’, action-oriented processes and ‘conceptual’, state-oriented processes. The use of this concept in image analysis has usually focused on the most salient vectors, and this works well, but many images contain a plethora of vectors, which makes their structure quite different from the linguistic transitivity structures with which Kress and van Leeuwen have compared ‘narrative’ images. It can also be asked whether facial expression vectors should be taken into account in discussing ‘reactions’, which Kress and van Leeuwen link only to eyeline vectors. Finally, the question can be raised as to whether actions are always realized by vectors. Drawing on a re-reading of Rudolf Arnheim’s account of vectors, these issues are outlined, their consequences discussed, and ways forward suggested.

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9781350026520

BT - New studies in multimodality

A2 - Seizov, Ognyan

A2 - Wildfeuer, Janina

PB - Bloomsbury Academic

ER -

Boeriis M, van Leeuwen T. Vectors. In Seizov O, Wildfeuer J, editors, New studies in multimodality: Conceptual and methodological elaborations. Bloomsbury Academic. 2017