Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validation of ratings on the six-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale obtained via the Simplified Negative and Positive Symptoms Interview among outpatients with schizophrenia

  • Cecilie Marie Nielsen*
  • , Pernille Kølbæk
  • , David Dines
  • , Martin Locht Pedersen
  • , Andreas Aalkjær Danielsen
  • , Camilla Holmgård
  • , Sanne Wissing
  • , Anne-Mette Esbøl
  • , Nina Friis Bak Fuglsang
  • , Tuan Dang Nguyen
  • , Ole Mors
  • , Mark Opler
  • , Christoph U. Correll
  • , Søren Dinesen Østergaard
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Aarhus University
  • Aarhus University Hospital
  • New York University School of Medicine
  • Zucker Hillside Hospital
  • Hofstra University
  • Charité Universitätsmedizin, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy
  • MedAvante-ProPhase Inc.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background:
The six-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6) is a measure of the severity of core symptoms of schizophrenia, which can be administered via the brief Simplified Negative and Positive Symptoms Interview (SNAPSI). A recent study has confirmed the validity of PANSS-6 ratings as derived by SNAPSI (PANSS-6SNAPSI) among inpatients with schizophrenia.

Aims:
We aimed to test the validity of PANSS-6SNAPSI among outpatients with schizophrenia using PANSS-6 ratings extracted from the 30-item PANSS-30 as derived by the Structured Clinical Interview for the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6SCI-PANSS) as a gold standard reference.

Methods:
PANSS-6SNAPSI and PANSS-6SCI-PANSS ratings were obtained at two time points by independent raters with established inter-rater reliability. Agreement between PANSS-6SNAPSI and PANSS-6SCI-PANSS ratings was estimated via intra-class coefficients (ICCs) and responsiveness over time was quantified using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. Post hoc “leave-one-out” analyses were carried out, in which each rater in turn was excluded from the ICC calculations.

Results:
Seventy-three outpatients with schizophrenia participated in the study (mean age: 38.3 years; 56% males). The ICC for PANSS-6SNAPSI versus PANSS-6SCI-PANSS was 0.67 [95%CI = 0.56–0.76] and the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient for responsiveness was 0.40 (p = 0.004). When data from a specific outlying rater were excluded, the ICC for PANSS-6SNAPSI versus PANSS-6SCI-PANSS was 0.75 [95% CI = 0.63–0.83] and the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient for responsiveness was 0.55 (p = 0.018).

Conclusions:
We found PANSS-6SNAPSI ratings to have acceptable clinical validity, suggesting that PANSS-6SNAPSI can be used for both inpatients and outpatients with schizophrenia.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Psychopharmacology
Volume36
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)1208–1217
ISSN0269-8811
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2022
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of ratings on the six-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale obtained via the Simplified Negative and Positive Symptoms Interview among outpatients with schizophrenia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this