Using Risk of Bias 2 to assess results from randomised controlled trials: guidance from Cochrane

Ella Flemyng, Theresa Helen Moore, Isabelle Boutron, Julian P.T. Higgins, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Camilla Hansen Nejstgaard, Kerry Dwan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

A systematic review identifies, appraises and synthesises all the empirical evidence from studies that meet prespecified eligibility criteria to answer a specific research question. As part of the appraisal, researchers use explicit methods to assess risk of bias in the results' from included studies that contribute to the review's findings, to improve our confidence in the review's conclusions. Randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane Reviews have used a specific risk of bias tool to assess these included studies since 2008. In 2019, a new version of this tool, Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2), was launched to improve its usability and to reflect current understanding of how the causes of bias can influence study results. Cochrane implemented RoB 2 in a phased approach, with users of the tool informing guidance development. This paper highlights learning for all systematic reviewers (Cochrane and non-Cochrane) from the phased implementation, highlighting differences between the original version of the tool and RoB 2, consideration of reporting systematic review protocols or full review reports that have used RoB 2, and some tips shared by authors during the pilot phase of the implementation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
Volume28
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)260-266
ISSN2515-446X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2023

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Humans
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Research Design
  • Research Report

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using Risk of Bias 2 to assess results from randomised controlled trials: guidance from Cochrane'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this