TY - GEN
T1 - University students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence-based tools beyond text generation
AU - Marchetti, Emanuela
AU - Frandsen, Tove Faber
AU - Sandu, Diana-Andreea
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This study explores the multifaceted roles of generative AI in university students' academic writing processes. Students often use AI to tackle writing challenges, perceiving its benefits like task simplification, though this may be due to novelty. Understanding AI's impact on learning is crucial but challenging to isolate. Providing effective guidance is crucial to fully harness the benefits of AI. Students typically use AI tools ad hoc and could often benefit from exploring more roles and improving their prompting skills. This study aims to introduce students to AI tools beyond text generation, focusing on creative aspects of academic work and exploring emergent design requirements for AI tools. Data were gathered through a focused ethnography methodology during a workshop on AI tools for academic writing. Students display a positive but critical attitude towards AI tools, recognizing their potential while articulating criticisms regarding performance and reliability. They find AI-generated texts more reliable than images. Opinions on AI tools vary, with some students viewing them as helpful for brainstorming and time-saving, while others express concerns about overreliance and the need for critical evaluation. Some tools are particularly favored for their interface and control. Students emphasize the importance of effective guidance and task-specific tools. Emergent design requirements include transparency, usability, and structured views to enhance AI tool reliability and user experience.
AB - This study explores the multifaceted roles of generative AI in university students' academic writing processes. Students often use AI to tackle writing challenges, perceiving its benefits like task simplification, though this may be due to novelty. Understanding AI's impact on learning is crucial but challenging to isolate. Providing effective guidance is crucial to fully harness the benefits of AI. Students typically use AI tools ad hoc and could often benefit from exploring more roles and improving their prompting skills. This study aims to introduce students to AI tools beyond text generation, focusing on creative aspects of academic work and exploring emergent design requirements for AI tools. Data were gathered through a focused ethnography methodology during a workshop on AI tools for academic writing. Students display a positive but critical attitude towards AI tools, recognizing their potential while articulating criticisms regarding performance and reliability. They find AI-generated texts more reliable than images. Opinions on AI tools vary, with some students viewing them as helpful for brainstorming and time-saving, while others express concerns about overreliance and the need for critical evaluation. Some tools are particularly favored for their interface and control. Students emphasize the importance of effective guidance and task-specific tools. Emergent design requirements include transparency, usability, and structured views to enhance AI tool reliability and user experience.
M3 - Article in proceedings
T3 - Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
BT - ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
ER -