TY - GEN
T1 - Understanding the Impact of an Empowerment-Oriented Practice and Engagement in Older Adults with Hip Fractures
AU - Pedersen, Lars Tobiesen
PY - 2024/6/6
Y1 - 2024/6/6
N2 - The focus of this PhD thesis examined the rehabilitation process for older adults who
experienced hip fractures within the context of the intervention ‘Rehabilitation for Life’.
These fractures cause significant problems for affected individuals, highlighting the
need for better rehabilitation and care strategies that can improve their functional
outcomes and quality of life. Healthcare providers from different disciplines and
different sectors must work together to provide comprehensive rehabilitation and care.
Unfortunately, this does not always happen, leading to communication gaps.
Comprehensive rehabilitation and care models need to be implemented to help bridge
these gaps. Traditional rehabilitation programmes often fail to engage patients
effectively, leading to less-than-optimal results. To provide the best possible care,
patients must be involved in the decision-making process and must maintain active
engagement in their care. This thesis aims to identify strategies that can improve
rehabilitation programmes to benefit patients.Study I: This was a quantitative study that aimed to evaluate the correlation between
Patient Activation Measure 13 (PAM-13) levels and physical function, mobility and
activities of daily living in older adults undergoing rehabilitation and care following hip
fracture. Functional outcomes were assessed using Timed Up and Go (TUG), the New
Mobility Score (NMS) and the Barthel-20 Index. The study included 239 older adults
with hip fractures who were divided into four groups based on PAM-13 levels
representing their ability to manage their health. Despite finding no significant
differences in baseline demographics among the PAM-13 groups, results showed that
patients with higher activation levels had shorter hospital stays. Patients at all PAM-13
levels had significant improvements in functional outcomes over time, with faster TUG
times and higher NMS and Barthel-20 scores. A secondary analysis comparing
participants undergoing the ‘Rehabilitation for Life’ programme with those receiving
‘Usual Rehabilitation’ found no difference in PAM-13 scores at discharge or the followup assessments.Study II: This study investigated healthcare professionals’ perspectives on
rehabilitating and care of older adults with hip fractures within the ‘Rehabilitation for
Life’ programme. Sixteen experienced nurses and physiotherapists shared insights
during focus group interviews. Three main themes emerged: 1) The importance of
structured rehabilitation plans for effective interventions; 2) The transformative role of
healthcare centres in providing support and motivation; and 3) The challenges of
balancing strength and functionality in patient-centred rehabilitation. Participants
emphasized the need for familiarity with rehabilitation and care programmes, the
supportive environment of healthcare centres and the importance of tailoring
interventions to individual functional goals.Study III: This study aimed to explore the experiences of older adults who participated
in the ‘Rehabilitation for Life’ intervention to support their recovery after hip fracture.
The study conducted in-depth interviews with 16 participants and identified five key
themes in the rehabilitation process. These themes included the following: 1) The
importance of receiving adequate information and care during hospital stays; 2) The
need for early visits from healthcare professionals after discharge; 3) The value of social
support during training; 4) The appreciation for empathetic and skilled staff; and 5) The
acceptance of a new identity post-injury. Despite the challenges posed by hip fractures,
the participants expressed their desire to regain mobility and independence. Overall, the three studies offer valuable insights into the rehabilitation process for hip
fractures. They emphasize the need for structured plans, supportive environments, and
personalized approaches to ensure successful recovery. Addressing the physical,
psychological, and social aspects of rehabilitation is essential for meeting the diverse
needs of patients. The findings highlight the complexity of hip fracture rehabilitation
and stress the importance of a multidisciplinary approach across sectors.
AB - The focus of this PhD thesis examined the rehabilitation process for older adults who
experienced hip fractures within the context of the intervention ‘Rehabilitation for Life’.
These fractures cause significant problems for affected individuals, highlighting the
need for better rehabilitation and care strategies that can improve their functional
outcomes and quality of life. Healthcare providers from different disciplines and
different sectors must work together to provide comprehensive rehabilitation and care.
Unfortunately, this does not always happen, leading to communication gaps.
Comprehensive rehabilitation and care models need to be implemented to help bridge
these gaps. Traditional rehabilitation programmes often fail to engage patients
effectively, leading to less-than-optimal results. To provide the best possible care,
patients must be involved in the decision-making process and must maintain active
engagement in their care. This thesis aims to identify strategies that can improve
rehabilitation programmes to benefit patients.Study I: This was a quantitative study that aimed to evaluate the correlation between
Patient Activation Measure 13 (PAM-13) levels and physical function, mobility and
activities of daily living in older adults undergoing rehabilitation and care following hip
fracture. Functional outcomes were assessed using Timed Up and Go (TUG), the New
Mobility Score (NMS) and the Barthel-20 Index. The study included 239 older adults
with hip fractures who were divided into four groups based on PAM-13 levels
representing their ability to manage their health. Despite finding no significant
differences in baseline demographics among the PAM-13 groups, results showed that
patients with higher activation levels had shorter hospital stays. Patients at all PAM-13
levels had significant improvements in functional outcomes over time, with faster TUG
times and higher NMS and Barthel-20 scores. A secondary analysis comparing
participants undergoing the ‘Rehabilitation for Life’ programme with those receiving
‘Usual Rehabilitation’ found no difference in PAM-13 scores at discharge or the followup assessments.Study II: This study investigated healthcare professionals’ perspectives on
rehabilitating and care of older adults with hip fractures within the ‘Rehabilitation for
Life’ programme. Sixteen experienced nurses and physiotherapists shared insights
during focus group interviews. Three main themes emerged: 1) The importance of
structured rehabilitation plans for effective interventions; 2) The transformative role of
healthcare centres in providing support and motivation; and 3) The challenges of
balancing strength and functionality in patient-centred rehabilitation. Participants
emphasized the need for familiarity with rehabilitation and care programmes, the
supportive environment of healthcare centres and the importance of tailoring
interventions to individual functional goals.Study III: This study aimed to explore the experiences of older adults who participated
in the ‘Rehabilitation for Life’ intervention to support their recovery after hip fracture.
The study conducted in-depth interviews with 16 participants and identified five key
themes in the rehabilitation process. These themes included the following: 1) The
importance of receiving adequate information and care during hospital stays; 2) The
need for early visits from healthcare professionals after discharge; 3) The value of social
support during training; 4) The appreciation for empathetic and skilled staff; and 5) The
acceptance of a new identity post-injury. Despite the challenges posed by hip fractures,
the participants expressed their desire to regain mobility and independence. Overall, the three studies offer valuable insights into the rehabilitation process for hip
fractures. They emphasize the need for structured plans, supportive environments, and
personalized approaches to ensure successful recovery. Addressing the physical,
psychological, and social aspects of rehabilitation is essential for meeting the diverse
needs of patients. The findings highlight the complexity of hip fracture rehabilitation
and stress the importance of a multidisciplinary approach across sectors.
U2 - 10.21996/xg0y-9468
DO - 10.21996/xg0y-9468
M3 - Ph.D. thesis
PB - Syddansk Universitet. Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet
ER -