Twins Support the Absence of Parity-Dependent Fertility Control in Pretransition Populations

Gregory Clark, Neil Cummins*, Matthew Curtis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

A conclusion of the European Fertility Project in 1986 was that pretransition populations mostly displayed natural fertility, where parity-dependent birth control was absent. This conclusion has recently been challenged for England by new empirical results and has also been widely rejected by theorists of long-run economic growth, where pre-industrial fertility control is integral to most models. In this study, we use the accident of twin births to show that for three Western European–derived pre-industrial populations—namely, England (1730–1879), France (1670–1788), and Québec (1621–1835)—we find no evidence for parity-dependent control of marital fertility. If a twin was born in any of these populations, family size increased by 1 compared with families with a singleton birth at the same parity and mother age, with no reduction of subsequent fertility. Numbers of children surviving to age 14 also increased. Twin births also show no differential effect on fertility when they occurred at high parities; this finding is in contrast to populations where fertility is known to have been controlled by at least some families, such as in England, 1900–1949, where a twin birth increased average births per family by significantly less than 1.

Original languageEnglish
JournalDemography
Volume57
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)1571-1595
Number of pages25
ISSN0070-3370
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1. Aug 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Economic growth
  • Economic history
  • Family planning
  • Fertility
  • Natural fertility

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Twins Support the Absence of Parity-Dependent Fertility Control in Pretransition Populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this