Trusting Relationships in International Politics

No Need to Hedge

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

139 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

How can trusting relationships be identified in international politics? The recent
wave of scholarship on trust in International Relations answers this question by looking for one or the combination of three indicators – the incidence of cooperation; discourses expressing trust; or the calculated acceptance of vulnerability. These methods are inadequate both theoretically and empirically. Distinguishing between the concepts of trust and confidence, we instead propose an approach that focuses on the actors’ hedging strategies. We argue that actors either declining to adopt or removing hedging strategies is a better indicator of a trusting relationship than the alternatives. We demonstrate the strength of our approach by showing how the existing approaches would suggest the US-Soviet relationship to be trusting when it was not so. In contrast, the US-Japanese alliance relationship allows us to show how we can
identify a developing trusting relationship.
Original languageEnglish
JournalReview of International Studies
Volume40
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)753-770
ISSN0260-2105
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1. Oct 2014

Fingerprint

International Politics
international relations
vulnerability
incidence
acceptance
confidence
discourse

Keywords

  • trust
  • confidence
  • international relations theory
  • hedging
  • United States
  • Soviet Union
  • Japan

Cite this

@article{820f267bd8644023b1e32ef0459c7bc9,
title = "Trusting Relationships in International Politics: No Need to Hedge",
abstract = "How can trusting relationships be identified in international politics? The recentwave of scholarship on trust in International Relations answers this question by looking for one or the combination of three indicators – the incidence of cooperation; discourses expressing trust; or the calculated acceptance of vulnerability. These methods are inadequate both theoretically and empirically. Distinguishing between the concepts of trust and confidence, we instead propose an approach that focuses on the actors’ hedging strategies. We argue that actors either declining to adopt or removing hedging strategies is a better indicator of a trusting relationship than the alternatives. We demonstrate the strength of our approach by showing how the existing approaches would suggest the US-Soviet relationship to be trusting when it was not so. In contrast, the US-Japanese alliance relationship allows us to show how we canidentify a developing trusting relationship.",
keywords = "trust, confidence, international relations theory, hedging, United States, Soviet Union, Japan",
author = "Keating, {Vincent Charles} and Jan Ruzicka",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0260210514000059",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "753--770",
journal = "Review of International Studies",
issn = "0260-2105",
publisher = "Heinemann",
number = "4",

}

Trusting Relationships in International Politics : No Need to Hedge. / Keating, Vincent Charles; Ruzicka, Jan.

In: Review of International Studies, Vol. 40, No. 4, 01.10.2014, p. 753-770.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trusting Relationships in International Politics

T2 - No Need to Hedge

AU - Keating, Vincent Charles

AU - Ruzicka, Jan

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - How can trusting relationships be identified in international politics? The recentwave of scholarship on trust in International Relations answers this question by looking for one or the combination of three indicators – the incidence of cooperation; discourses expressing trust; or the calculated acceptance of vulnerability. These methods are inadequate both theoretically and empirically. Distinguishing between the concepts of trust and confidence, we instead propose an approach that focuses on the actors’ hedging strategies. We argue that actors either declining to adopt or removing hedging strategies is a better indicator of a trusting relationship than the alternatives. We demonstrate the strength of our approach by showing how the existing approaches would suggest the US-Soviet relationship to be trusting when it was not so. In contrast, the US-Japanese alliance relationship allows us to show how we canidentify a developing trusting relationship.

AB - How can trusting relationships be identified in international politics? The recentwave of scholarship on trust in International Relations answers this question by looking for one or the combination of three indicators – the incidence of cooperation; discourses expressing trust; or the calculated acceptance of vulnerability. These methods are inadequate both theoretically and empirically. Distinguishing between the concepts of trust and confidence, we instead propose an approach that focuses on the actors’ hedging strategies. We argue that actors either declining to adopt or removing hedging strategies is a better indicator of a trusting relationship than the alternatives. We demonstrate the strength of our approach by showing how the existing approaches would suggest the US-Soviet relationship to be trusting when it was not so. In contrast, the US-Japanese alliance relationship allows us to show how we canidentify a developing trusting relationship.

KW - trust

KW - confidence

KW - international relations theory

KW - hedging

KW - United States

KW - Soviet Union

KW - Japan

U2 - 10.1017/S0260210514000059

DO - 10.1017/S0260210514000059

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

SP - 753

EP - 770

JO - Review of International Studies

JF - Review of International Studies

SN - 0260-2105

IS - 4

ER -