The unseen toll: excess mortality during covid-19 lockdowns

Florian Ege, Giovanni Mellace, Seetha Menon*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In March 2020, in an attempt to slow the spread of Covid-19, several countries intervened by imposing strict lockdown measures that limited contact among people. In contrast, Sweden decided to not implement a mandatory lockdown and instead allowed people free choice on whether or not to follow the government recommendation to limit contact with others. Using the Synthetic Control Method, we estimate the causal effect of not implementing a mandatory lockdown in Sweden in the period from the end of February 2020 to the end of September 2020, a time when vaccines were as yet not available. We find that not imposing a mandatory lockdown resulted in a lower reduction of mobility and a substantial increase in mortality. Our results indicates that up to about 4411 of the 46554 deaths registered in Sweden during this period could have been avoided had Sweden implemented a mandatory lockdown. These results remain consistent when using two additional state-of-the-art estimation methods; the augmented synthetic control method and synthetic difference-in-difference.
Original languageEnglish
Article number18745
JournalScientific Reports
Volume13
Issue number1
Number of pages9
ISSN2045-2322
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • Mortality
  • COVID-19
  • Scandinavia
  • COVID-19/epidemiology
  • Government
  • Humans
  • Communicable Disease Control
  • Sweden/epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The unseen toll: excess mortality during covid-19 lockdowns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this