The tension between podcasters and platforms: Independent podcasters’ experiences of the paid subscription model

Freja Sørine Adler Berg*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    495 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In 2019, Podimo, a major paid subscription podcast platform, was launched in Denmark. This sparked a recurring debate among independent podcasters in small language areas with a correspondingly small podcast market: How can podcasters working independently of public service institutions and commercial companies find viable funding models? Taking its departure from the research field of creative labour in the cultural industries and research on the platformization of podcasts, this article explores the inherent tensions between creativity and commerce that independent podcasters experience specifically in relation to paid subscription platforms. This is done by conducting and analysing qualitative interviews with four Danish independent podcasters (The Bad Judges, The Tear Channel, Childless Birds, and Third Ear) who have decided to become exclusive content on Podimo, thereby intensifying the shift from being free labour to paid labour. Interviews are combined with transcriptions of podcast episodes in which podcasters seek to justify why they joined Podimo. The analysis reveals commerce, autonomy and discovery as the podcasters’ key motivations, while their overriding concern is the drop of listeners’ numbers.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalCreative Industries Journal
    Volume15
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)58-78
    ISSN1751-0694
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2022

    Keywords

    • podcasting
    • cultural industries
    • podcasters
    • creative labour
    • platform
    • paid subscription

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The tension between podcasters and platforms: Independent podcasters’ experiences of the paid subscription model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this