Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: Psychological violence is estimated to be the most common form of intimate partner violence (IPV). Despite this, research on the independent effect of psychological violence on mental health is scarce. Moreover, the lack of a clear and consistent definition of psychological violence has made results difficult to compare. The present study therefore aims to consolidate knowledge on psychological violence by conducting a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis on the association between psychological violence and mental health problems, when controlling for other types of violence (e.g. physical and sexual) and taking into account severity, frequency, and duration of psychological violence.
METHOD: The present study is registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; #CRD42018116026) and the study design follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA; Additional file 1). A dual search will be conducted in the electronic databases PsycINFO, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Data will be extracted using Endnote and Covidence and a meta-analysis will be conducted using Metafor-package in the programming language R. The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies developed by the Effective Public Health Practice Project will be used to assess the quality of the included studies (i.e. weak, moderate and strong).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The present review will help consolidate knowledge on psychological violence by evaluating whether frequency, severity or actual "type" of psychological violence produces the most harm. A thorough quality assessment will help overcome potential limitations regarding expected variations in terminology and assessment of psychological violence.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018116026 .
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 198 |
| Journal | BMC Sys Rev |
| Volume | 8 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| ISSN | 2046-4053 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 9. Aug 2019 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Abbreviations
- Aggression
- Assessment
- Coercion
- DSM Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
- EIGE European Institute of Gender Equality
- Emotional abuse, Intimate partner violence
- ICD International Classification of Diseases
- IPV Intimate Partner Violence
- Mental health
- NICE National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
- PMWI Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory
- PTSD
- PTSD Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
- Psychological violence
- Psychometrics
Cite this
}
The psychological subtype of intimate partner violence and its effect on mental health : protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. / Dokkedahl, Sarah; Kok, Robin Niels; Murphy, Siobhan; Kristensen, Trine Rønde; Bech-Hansen, Ditte; Elklit, Ask.
In: BMC Sys Rev, Vol. 8, 198, 09.08.2019.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - The psychological subtype of intimate partner violence and its effect on mental health
T2 - protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Dokkedahl, Sarah
AU - Kok, Robin Niels
AU - Murphy, Siobhan
AU - Kristensen, Trine Rønde
AU - Bech-Hansen, Ditte
AU - Elklit, Ask
PY - 2019/8/9
Y1 - 2019/8/9
N2 - BACKGROUND/AIM: Psychological violence is estimated to be the most common form of intimate partner violence (IPV). Despite this, research on the independent effect of psychological violence on mental health is scarce. Moreover, the lack of a clear and consistent definition of psychological violence has made results difficult to compare. The present study therefore aims to consolidate knowledge on psychological violence by conducting a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis on the association between psychological violence and mental health problems, when controlling for other types of violence (e.g. physical and sexual) and taking into account severity, frequency, and duration of psychological violence.METHOD: The present study is registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; #CRD42018116026) and the study design follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA; Additional file 1). A dual search will be conducted in the electronic databases PsycINFO, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Data will be extracted using Endnote and Covidence and a meta-analysis will be conducted using Metafor-package in the programming language R. The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies developed by the Effective Public Health Practice Project will be used to assess the quality of the included studies (i.e. weak, moderate and strong).RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The present review will help consolidate knowledge on psychological violence by evaluating whether frequency, severity or actual "type" of psychological violence produces the most harm. A thorough quality assessment will help overcome potential limitations regarding expected variations in terminology and assessment of psychological violence.SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018116026 .
AB - BACKGROUND/AIM: Psychological violence is estimated to be the most common form of intimate partner violence (IPV). Despite this, research on the independent effect of psychological violence on mental health is scarce. Moreover, the lack of a clear and consistent definition of psychological violence has made results difficult to compare. The present study therefore aims to consolidate knowledge on psychological violence by conducting a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis on the association between psychological violence and mental health problems, when controlling for other types of violence (e.g. physical and sexual) and taking into account severity, frequency, and duration of psychological violence.METHOD: The present study is registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; #CRD42018116026) and the study design follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA; Additional file 1). A dual search will be conducted in the electronic databases PsycINFO, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Data will be extracted using Endnote and Covidence and a meta-analysis will be conducted using Metafor-package in the programming language R. The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies developed by the Effective Public Health Practice Project will be used to assess the quality of the included studies (i.e. weak, moderate and strong).RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The present review will help consolidate knowledge on psychological violence by evaluating whether frequency, severity or actual "type" of psychological violence produces the most harm. A thorough quality assessment will help overcome potential limitations regarding expected variations in terminology and assessment of psychological violence.SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018116026 .
KW - Abbreviations
KW - Aggression
KW - Assessment
KW - Coercion
KW - DSM Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
KW - EIGE European Institute of Gender Equality
KW - Emotional abuse, Intimate partner violence
KW - ICD International Classification of Diseases
KW - IPV Intimate Partner Violence
KW - Mental health
KW - NICE National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
KW - PMWI Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory
KW - PTSD
KW - PTSD Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
KW - Psychological violence
KW - Psychometrics
U2 - 10.1186/s13643-019-1118-1
DO - 10.1186/s13643-019-1118-1
M3 - Review
C2 - 31399073
VL - 8
JO - Systematic Reviews
JF - Systematic Reviews
SN - 2046-4053
M1 - 198
ER -