Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

  • Matthew J. Page*
  • , Joanne E. McKenzie
  • , Patrick M. Bossuyt
  • , Isabelle Boutron
  • , Tammy C. Hoffmann
  • , Cynthia D. Mulrow
  • , Larissa Shamseer
  • , Jennifer M. Tetzlaff
  • , Elie A. Akl
  • , Sue E. Brennan
  • , Roger Chou
  • , Julie Glanville
  • , Jeremy M. Grimshaw
  • , Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
  • , Manoj M. Lalu
  • , Tianjing Li
  • , Elizabeth W. Loder
  • , Evan Mayo-Wilson
  • , Steve McDonald
  • , Luke A. McGuinness
  • Lesley A. Stewart, James Thomas, Andrea C. Tricco, Vivian A. Welch, Penny Whiting, David Moher
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Monash University
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Paris Hospitals and Paris Descartes University
  • Bond University
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
  • Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute
  • Evidence Partners
  • American University of Beirut
  • Oregon Health & Science University
  • York Health Economics Consortium
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
  • Ottawa Hospital
  • University of Colorado-Denver
  • Harvard Medical School
  • Indiana University
  • University of Bristol
  • York University
  • Institute for Global Health
  • Bruyère Research Institute

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

952 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume134
Pages (from-to)178-189
ISSN0895-4356
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1. Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Keywords

  • Checklist
  • Meta-analysis
  • Reporting guideline
  • Reproducibility
  • Systematic review
  • Transparency

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this