Abstract
In this article, using the French pension reform in 2020 as a case, we demonstrate how a focus on emotions helps us to better understand important policy dynamics. While existing approaches of welfare state reform typically focus on rational-materialist and institutionalist approaches, we use appraisal theory of emotion to explain how the reform project and process on the one hand and interest group behaviour and protest on the other are linked via a mechanism of anger. Material interests of different groups of citizens and trade unions clearly matter, but they cannot sufficiently explain the process through which disagreement could erupt in one of the largest and longest protest movements in recent French history. Theoretically integrating material interests and moral reasoning and using a variety of qualitative and public opinion data, we trace the escalation of conflict between key actors which ultimately impeded a comprehensive reform in 2020. Our findings have important implications for research on the role of emotions in policymaking.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Policy & Politics |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 152–177 |
| ISSN | 1470-8442 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
Funding
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – project no. 374666841 – SFB 1342 as well as VELUX FONDEN – grant no. 26613 – Velux Core Group ‘The Politics of Insecurity (POINS)’. Johanna Kuhlmann was also supported by the DaWS Early Career Grant of the Danish Centre for Welfare Studies (DaWS).
Keywords
- France
- anger
- emotion
- pension reform
- protest
- retrenchment
- social policy
- welfare state
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The politics of anger: emotional appraisal mechanisms and the French pension reform protests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver