TY - CHAP
T1 - The Political Demography of Missed Opportunity
T2 - Populations and Policies in a Younger but Faster-Ageing East Central Europe, 1990–2040
AU - Vanhuysse, Pieter
AU - Perek-Bialas, Jolanta
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The new democracies in East Central Europe started the post-communist era with comparatively young populations. After 1989-1990, they have largely spurned a quarter-century long demographic window of opportunity for reform, by insufficiently adapting their policy models to prepare for predicted fast population aging ahead. Especially in Romania, Bulgaria and the Visegrad Four, this is reflected in low active aging and child wellbeing index rankings, relatively small social investment in early human capital, weak improvements in prospective old age dependency ratios, and large-scale emigration. Slovenia and the Visegrad Four, but not the Baltics, also became ”pensioners‘ welfare states,” with prematurely strong pro-elderly policy bias. In some cases, massive early exit worsened pension system unsustainability while boosting pensioners’ electoral power (political push before demographic pull). However, around the time when the demographic window closed (2010-2015), the political salience of family policies, work-family reconciliation policies, and active aging policy increased, often spurred by the same Christian-conservative and/or nationalist-populist parties that caused significant democratic backsliding. But by then, the relative political power of elderly voters during elections in East Central Europe was among the highest in the world.
AB - The new democracies in East Central Europe started the post-communist era with comparatively young populations. After 1989-1990, they have largely spurned a quarter-century long demographic window of opportunity for reform, by insufficiently adapting their policy models to prepare for predicted fast population aging ahead. Especially in Romania, Bulgaria and the Visegrad Four, this is reflected in low active aging and child wellbeing index rankings, relatively small social investment in early human capital, weak improvements in prospective old age dependency ratios, and large-scale emigration. Slovenia and the Visegrad Four, but not the Baltics, also became ”pensioners‘ welfare states,” with prematurely strong pro-elderly policy bias. In some cases, massive early exit worsened pension system unsustainability while boosting pensioners’ electoral power (political push before demographic pull). However, around the time when the demographic window closed (2010-2015), the political salience of family policies, work-family reconciliation policies, and active aging policy increased, often spurred by the same Christian-conservative and/or nationalist-populist parties that caused significant democratic backsliding. But by then, the relative political power of elderly voters during elections in East Central Europe was among the highest in the world.
KW - pro-elderly policy bias
KW - politics of populations
KW - active aging
KW - new democracies
KW - Central and Eastern Europe
KW - global political demography
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-73065-9_15
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-73065-9_15
M3 - Book chapter
SN - 9783030730673
SN - 9783030730642
SP - 373
EP - 399
BT - Global Political Demography
A2 - Goerres, Achim
A2 - Vanhuysse, Pieter
PB - Palgrave Macmillan
ER -