The philosopher and the reader

Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein on love and philosophical method

Anne-Marie Søndergaard Christensen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In his diaries from the beginning of the 1930s, Ludwig Wittgenstein comments extensively both on Søren Kierkegaard's view of philosophical method and on his view of love. The aim of this article is to show how Wittgenstein's reflections on Kierkegaard's view of love reveal a fundamental difference between the two thinkers' views of philosophical method, a difference in their view of the role of the reader of and partner in doing philosophy, between Kierkegaard's indirect communication to the reader and Wittgenstein's dialogical engagement with the reader. The article opens with a presentation of substantial similarities between Wittgenstein's and Kierkegaard's conceptions of philosophy. After this, I present an account of Kierkegaard's view of love and marriage, an understanding of which is necessary in order to understand Wittgenstein's reservations towards Kierkegaard. This in turn leads me to the main investigation that shows how a difference in Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein's views on love connects to a fundamental difference in their views of philosophy. This difference between the two thinkers will finally be elucidated through the understanding of love developed by Stanley Cavell in his work on the so‐called Hollywood remarriage comedies.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Philosophy
VolumeEarly view
ISSN0966-8373
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 7. Aug 2019

Fingerprint

Reader
Søren Kierkegaard
Philosophical Method
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Philosopher
Philosophy
Thinkers
Fundamental
Marriage
Communication
1930s
Reservation
Comedies
Diary
Stanley Cavell
Conception
Hollywood
Remarriage

Cite this

@article{6becfe8ccda1415189a7695cef35398f,
title = "The philosopher and the reader: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein on love and philosophical method",
abstract = "In his diaries from the beginning of the 1930s, Ludwig Wittgenstein comments extensively both on S{\o}ren Kierkegaard's view of philosophical method and on his view of love. The aim of this article is to show how Wittgenstein's reflections on Kierkegaard's view of love reveal a fundamental difference between the two thinkers' views of philosophical method, a difference in their view of the role of the reader of and partner in doing philosophy, between Kierkegaard's indirect communication to the reader and Wittgenstein's dialogical engagement with the reader. The article opens with a presentation of substantial similarities between Wittgenstein's and Kierkegaard's conceptions of philosophy. After this, I present an account of Kierkegaard's view of love and marriage, an understanding of which is necessary in order to understand Wittgenstein's reservations towards Kierkegaard. This in turn leads me to the main investigation that shows how a difference in Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein's views on love connects to a fundamental difference in their views of philosophy. This difference between the two thinkers will finally be elucidated through the understanding of love developed by Stanley Cavell in his work on the so‐called Hollywood remarriage comedies.",
author = "Christensen, {Anne-Marie S{\o}ndergaard}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1111/ejop.12473",
language = "English",
volume = "Early view",
journal = "European Journal of Philosophy",
issn = "0966-8373",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

The philosopher and the reader : Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein on love and philosophical method. / Christensen, Anne-Marie Søndergaard.

In: European Journal of Philosophy, Vol. Early view, 07.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The philosopher and the reader

T2 - Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein on love and philosophical method

AU - Christensen, Anne-Marie Søndergaard

PY - 2019/8/7

Y1 - 2019/8/7

N2 - In his diaries from the beginning of the 1930s, Ludwig Wittgenstein comments extensively both on Søren Kierkegaard's view of philosophical method and on his view of love. The aim of this article is to show how Wittgenstein's reflections on Kierkegaard's view of love reveal a fundamental difference between the two thinkers' views of philosophical method, a difference in their view of the role of the reader of and partner in doing philosophy, between Kierkegaard's indirect communication to the reader and Wittgenstein's dialogical engagement with the reader. The article opens with a presentation of substantial similarities between Wittgenstein's and Kierkegaard's conceptions of philosophy. After this, I present an account of Kierkegaard's view of love and marriage, an understanding of which is necessary in order to understand Wittgenstein's reservations towards Kierkegaard. This in turn leads me to the main investigation that shows how a difference in Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein's views on love connects to a fundamental difference in their views of philosophy. This difference between the two thinkers will finally be elucidated through the understanding of love developed by Stanley Cavell in his work on the so‐called Hollywood remarriage comedies.

AB - In his diaries from the beginning of the 1930s, Ludwig Wittgenstein comments extensively both on Søren Kierkegaard's view of philosophical method and on his view of love. The aim of this article is to show how Wittgenstein's reflections on Kierkegaard's view of love reveal a fundamental difference between the two thinkers' views of philosophical method, a difference in their view of the role of the reader of and partner in doing philosophy, between Kierkegaard's indirect communication to the reader and Wittgenstein's dialogical engagement with the reader. The article opens with a presentation of substantial similarities between Wittgenstein's and Kierkegaard's conceptions of philosophy. After this, I present an account of Kierkegaard's view of love and marriage, an understanding of which is necessary in order to understand Wittgenstein's reservations towards Kierkegaard. This in turn leads me to the main investigation that shows how a difference in Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein's views on love connects to a fundamental difference in their views of philosophy. This difference between the two thinkers will finally be elucidated through the understanding of love developed by Stanley Cavell in his work on the so‐called Hollywood remarriage comedies.

U2 - 10.1111/ejop.12473

DO - 10.1111/ejop.12473

M3 - Journal article

VL - Early view

JO - European Journal of Philosophy

JF - European Journal of Philosophy

SN - 0966-8373

ER -