The Limited Immediate Effects of CJEU’s Achmea Judgement

Steffen Hindelang

doi:10.17176/20180309-092343

The Limited Immediate Effects of CJEU’s Achmea Judgement

Steffen Hindelang

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › Communication

50 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

It seemed that Court of Justice of the European Union wanted to make it short and sweet: It took the Grand Chamber in its Achmea Decision less than fifteen pages to conclude that Investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS), as we know it, shall belong to the past, at least in an intra-EU context. Finito della musica? Not quite!

Original language	English
Newspaper	Verfassungsblog.de
Number of pages	6
ISSN	2366-7044
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.17176/20180309-092343
Publication status	Published - 2018

Keywords

Europe
intra-EU BITs
EU law
international investment law
ISDS
investor-state dispute settlement

Documents & Links

10.17176/20180309-092343Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

The Limited Immediate Effects of CJEU’s AchmeaFinal published version, 78.5 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

1 Guest lectures, external teaching and course activities at other universities

The Court of Justice of the European Union and the Future of Investment Arbitration
Steffen Hindelang (Guest lecturer)
24. Apr 2018
Activity: Talks and presentations › Guest lectures, external teaching and course activities at other universities

Cite this

@article{c468b75e17a0444c8e968d0d1b0c3896,

title = "The Limited Immediate Effects of CJEU{\textquoteright}s Achmea Judgement",

abstract = "It seemed that Court of Justice of the European Union wanted to make it short and sweet: It took the Grand Chamber in its Achmea Decision less than fifteen pages to conclude that Investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS), as we know it, shall belong to the past, at least in an intra-EU context. Finito della musica? Not quite!",

keywords = "Europe, intra-EU BITs, EU law, international investment law, ISDS, investor-state dispute settlement",

author = "Steffen Hindelang",

year = "2018",

doi = "10.17176/20180309-092343",

language = "English",

journal = "Verfassungsblog.de",

issn = "2366-7044",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Limited Immediate Effects of CJEU’s Achmea Judgement

AU - Hindelang, Steffen

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - It seemed that Court of Justice of the European Union wanted to make it short and sweet: It took the Grand Chamber in its Achmea Decision less than fifteen pages to conclude that Investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS), as we know it, shall belong to the past, at least in an intra-EU context. Finito della musica? Not quite!

AB - It seemed that Court of Justice of the European Union wanted to make it short and sweet: It took the Grand Chamber in its Achmea Decision less than fifteen pages to conclude that Investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS), as we know it, shall belong to the past, at least in an intra-EU context. Finito della musica? Not quite!

KW - Europe

KW - intra-EU BITs

KW - EU law

KW - international investment law

KW - ISDS

KW - investor-state dispute settlement

U2 - 10.17176/20180309-092343

DO - 10.17176/20180309-092343

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 2366-7044

JO - Verfassungsblog.de

JF - Verfassungsblog.de

ER -

The Limited Immediate Effects of CJEU’s Achmea Judgement

Abstract

Keywords

Documents & Links

Fingerprint

Related Activities

The Court of Justice of the European Union and the Future of Investment Arbitration

Cite this