The interplay of (semiotic) technologies and genre

The case of the selfie

Sumin Zhao, Michele Zappavigna

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Abstract
The selfie is one of the most widely publicised, criticized, and debated visual phenomena of our time. However, formulating a definition of the selfie is not straightforward, as visual clues—be they representational or compositional—alone are not sufficient for identification (Authors, 2017). Recognising an image as a selfie, rather than a portrait, often requires viewers to “make inferences about the non-depictive technocultural conditions in which the image was made” (Frosh, 2015, p. 1608). In this paper, we consider in detail the technological conditions that have shaped the evolution of the selfie as a visual genre. Central to our discussion is the premise that the selfie is not simply a genre for self-representation, but means of generating various perspectives: that of the selfie maker, the represented visual participant, and the viewer (Authors, 2017, a. b.). This unique perspective-generating affordance of the selfie is both facilitated and constrained by the various technologies involved in selfie practices. On the one hand, the technological and physical constraints of the smart phone camera give rise to a specific form of ‘distorted’ look which makes certain types of selfie possible, e.g. presented selfies (a close up portrait of the selfie maker in an unbalanced composition, and inferred or implied selfies (where perspective of the self is represented by body part or an object). On the other hand, social media platforms facilitate the sharing of selfies, which results in increasingly stylized and creative ways in which perspectives of the self can be represented, negotiated, and, in the case of selfies manipulated via apps, augmented.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSocial Semiotics
Volume28
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)665-682
ISSN1035-0330
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Semiotics
Application programs
semiotics
genre
Cameras
Chemical analysis
social media
Viewer

Keywords

  • Selfies
  • Social Semiotics
  • Genre
  • Social Media Flatform
  • social semiotics
  • social media platforms
  • and phone camera
  • genre
  • photo-editing application

Cite this

Zhao, Sumin ; Zappavigna, Michele . / The interplay of (semiotic) technologies and genre : The case of the selfie. In: Social Semiotics. 2018 ; Vol. 28, No. 5. pp. 665-682.
@article{1f02f429d284450283025ed90b173245,
title = "The interplay of (semiotic) technologies and genre: The case of the selfie",
abstract = "AbstractThe selfie is one of the most widely publicised, criticized, and debated visual phenomena of our time. However, formulating a definition of the selfie is not straightforward, as visual clues—be they representational or compositional—alone are not sufficient for identification (Authors, 2017). Recognising an image as a selfie, rather than a portrait, often requires viewers to “make inferences about the non-depictive technocultural conditions in which the image was made” (Frosh, 2015, p. 1608). In this paper, we consider in detail the technological conditions that have shaped the evolution of the selfie as a visual genre. Central to our discussion is the premise that the selfie is not simply a genre for self-representation, but means of generating various perspectives: that of the selfie maker, the represented visual participant, and the viewer (Authors, 2017, a. b.). This unique perspective-generating affordance of the selfie is both facilitated and constrained by the various technologies involved in selfie practices. On the one hand, the technological and physical constraints of the smart phone camera give rise to a specific form of ‘distorted’ look which makes certain types of selfie possible, e.g. presented selfies (a close up portrait of the selfie maker in an unbalanced composition, and inferred or implied selfies (where perspective of the self is represented by body part or an object). On the other hand, social media platforms facilitate the sharing of selfies, which results in increasingly stylized and creative ways in which perspectives of the self can be represented, negotiated, and, in the case of selfies manipulated via apps, augmented.",
keywords = "Selfies, Social Semiotics, Genre, Social Media Flatform, social semiotics, social media platforms, and phone camera, genre, photo-editing application",
author = "Sumin Zhao and Michele Zappavigna",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/10350330.2018.1504724",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "665--682",
journal = "Social Semiotics",
issn = "1035-0330",
publisher = "Heinemann",
number = "5",

}

The interplay of (semiotic) technologies and genre : The case of the selfie. / Zhao, Sumin; Zappavigna, Michele .

In: Social Semiotics, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2018, p. 665-682.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The interplay of (semiotic) technologies and genre

T2 - The case of the selfie

AU - Zhao, Sumin

AU - Zappavigna, Michele

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - AbstractThe selfie is one of the most widely publicised, criticized, and debated visual phenomena of our time. However, formulating a definition of the selfie is not straightforward, as visual clues—be they representational or compositional—alone are not sufficient for identification (Authors, 2017). Recognising an image as a selfie, rather than a portrait, often requires viewers to “make inferences about the non-depictive technocultural conditions in which the image was made” (Frosh, 2015, p. 1608). In this paper, we consider in detail the technological conditions that have shaped the evolution of the selfie as a visual genre. Central to our discussion is the premise that the selfie is not simply a genre for self-representation, but means of generating various perspectives: that of the selfie maker, the represented visual participant, and the viewer (Authors, 2017, a. b.). This unique perspective-generating affordance of the selfie is both facilitated and constrained by the various technologies involved in selfie practices. On the one hand, the technological and physical constraints of the smart phone camera give rise to a specific form of ‘distorted’ look which makes certain types of selfie possible, e.g. presented selfies (a close up portrait of the selfie maker in an unbalanced composition, and inferred or implied selfies (where perspective of the self is represented by body part or an object). On the other hand, social media platforms facilitate the sharing of selfies, which results in increasingly stylized and creative ways in which perspectives of the self can be represented, negotiated, and, in the case of selfies manipulated via apps, augmented.

AB - AbstractThe selfie is one of the most widely publicised, criticized, and debated visual phenomena of our time. However, formulating a definition of the selfie is not straightforward, as visual clues—be they representational or compositional—alone are not sufficient for identification (Authors, 2017). Recognising an image as a selfie, rather than a portrait, often requires viewers to “make inferences about the non-depictive technocultural conditions in which the image was made” (Frosh, 2015, p. 1608). In this paper, we consider in detail the technological conditions that have shaped the evolution of the selfie as a visual genre. Central to our discussion is the premise that the selfie is not simply a genre for self-representation, but means of generating various perspectives: that of the selfie maker, the represented visual participant, and the viewer (Authors, 2017, a. b.). This unique perspective-generating affordance of the selfie is both facilitated and constrained by the various technologies involved in selfie practices. On the one hand, the technological and physical constraints of the smart phone camera give rise to a specific form of ‘distorted’ look which makes certain types of selfie possible, e.g. presented selfies (a close up portrait of the selfie maker in an unbalanced composition, and inferred or implied selfies (where perspective of the self is represented by body part or an object). On the other hand, social media platforms facilitate the sharing of selfies, which results in increasingly stylized and creative ways in which perspectives of the self can be represented, negotiated, and, in the case of selfies manipulated via apps, augmented.

KW - Selfies

KW - Social Semiotics

KW - Genre

KW - Social Media Flatform

KW - social semiotics

KW - social media platforms

KW - and phone camera

KW - genre

KW - photo-editing application

U2 - 10.1080/10350330.2018.1504724

DO - 10.1080/10350330.2018.1504724

M3 - Journal article

VL - 28

SP - 665

EP - 682

JO - Social Semiotics

JF - Social Semiotics

SN - 1035-0330

IS - 5

ER -