Abstract
The public debate on the effectiveness of lockdown measures is far from being settled. We estimate the impact of not having implemented a strict lockdown in the Bergamo province, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, despite observing an infection rate in this area similar to the one observed in nearby municipalities where a strict lockdown was instead promptly implemented. We estimate the causal effect of this policy decision on daily excess mortality using the synthetic control method (SCM). We find that about two-thirds of the reported deaths could have been avoided had the Italian government declared a Red Zone in the Bergamo province. We also clarify that, in this context, SCM and difference-in-differences implicitly restrict effect heterogeneity. We provide a way to empirically assess the credibility of this assumption in our setting.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 102580 |
Journal | Labour Economics |
Volume | 89 |
Number of pages | 13 |
ISSN | 0927-5371 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2024 |
Keywords
- Bergamo
- Causal impact
- COVID-19
- Non-pharmaceutical interventions
- Red zone
- Synthetic control method