The Global Spine Care Initiative: a systematic review of individual and community-based burden of spinal disorders in rural populations in low- and middle-income communities

Eric L Hurwitz, Kristi Randhawa, Paola Torres, Hainan Yu, Leslie Verville, Jan Hartvigsen, Pierre Côté, Scott Haldeman

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this review was to synthesize literature on the burden of spinal disorders in rural communities to inform the Global Spine Care Initiative care pathway and model of care for their application in medically underserved areas and low- and middle-income countries. Methods: A systematic review was conducted. Inclusion criteria included all age groups with nonspecific low back pain, neck pain, and associated disorders, nonspecific thoracic spinal pain, musculoskeletal chest pain, radiculopathy, or spinal stenosis. Study designs included observational study design (case-control, cross-sectional, cohort, ecologic, qualitative) or review or meta-analysis. After study selection, studies with low or moderate risk of bias were qualitatively synthesized. Results: Of 1150 potentially relevant articles, 43 were eligible and included in the review. All 10 low and 18 moderate risk of bias studies were cross-sectional, 14 of which included rural residents only. All studies included estimates of low back pain prevalence, one included neck pain and one reported estimates for spinal disorders other than back or neck pain. The prevalence of low back pain appears greater among females and in those with less education, psychological factors (stress, anxiety, depression), and alcohol consumers. The literature is inconsistent as to whether back pain is more common in rural or urban areas. High risk of bias in many studies, lack of data on disability and other burden measures and few studies on conditions other than back and neck pain preclude a more comprehensive assessment of the individual and community-based burden of spinal disorders in less-developed communities. Conclusion: We identified few high-quality studies that may inform patients, providers, policymakers, and other stakeholders about spinal disorders and their burden on individuals and communities in most rural places of the developing world. These findings should be a call to action to devote resources for high-quality research to fill these knowledge gaps in medically underserved areas and low and middle-income countries. Graphical abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material. [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Spine Journal
Volume27
Issue numberSuppl. 6
Pages (from-to)802-815
ISSN0940-6719
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018

Keywords

  • Back pain
  • Global burden of disease
  • Neck pain
  • Spine
  • Humans
  • Occupational Diseases/epidemiology
  • Neck Pain/epidemiology
  • Health Behavior
  • Low Back Pain/epidemiology
  • Rural Population
  • Stress, Psychological/epidemiology
  • Developing Countries
  • Spinal Diseases/epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Global Spine Care Initiative: a systematic review of individual and community-based burden of spinal disorders in rural populations in low- and middle-income communities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this