TY - JOUR
T1 - The effectiveness of social-support-based weight-loss interventions
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Jensen, Mette Tækker
AU - Nielsen, Svetlana Solgaard
AU - Jessen-Winge, Christina
AU - Madsen, Christina Merete Tvede
AU - Thilsing, Trine
AU - Larrabee Sønderlund, Anders
AU - Christensen, Jeanette Reffstrup
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2024.
PY - 2024/5
Y1 - 2024/5
N2 - Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of social-support-based weight-loss interventions in adult populations with excess weight or obesity. Methods: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials that reported on the effectiveness of weight-loss interventions which incorporated a social connectedness component. To this end, we conducted a rigorous database search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane, and PubMed for relevant articles. The quality of eligible trials was evaluated by the Cochrane Risk‐of‐Bias2 tool. Five meta‐analyses on intervention effectiveness in terms of weight loss were executed at 2–4-month assessment, 6-month assessment, end of intervention, and 3- and 6-month follow-up. Results: Twenty-four trials involving couples or peers targeting weight loss in 4 919 adults with BMI ≥ 25 met inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses detected no significant effect of social-support-based weight-loss interventions at either 2–4 month or 6-month assessment. There were, however, significant effects at end of intervention [95% CI 0.39, p = 0.04] and at 3-month [95% CI 0.63, p < 0.01] and 6-month [95% CI 0.34, p = 0.05] follow-up. Conclusions: There seem to be a significant effect at the end of intervention and 3- and 6-month follow-up. However, further high-quality studies are needed before drawing any clear conclusions. Trial registration: PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020173696.
AB - Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of social-support-based weight-loss interventions in adult populations with excess weight or obesity. Methods: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials that reported on the effectiveness of weight-loss interventions which incorporated a social connectedness component. To this end, we conducted a rigorous database search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane, and PubMed for relevant articles. The quality of eligible trials was evaluated by the Cochrane Risk‐of‐Bias2 tool. Five meta‐analyses on intervention effectiveness in terms of weight loss were executed at 2–4-month assessment, 6-month assessment, end of intervention, and 3- and 6-month follow-up. Results: Twenty-four trials involving couples or peers targeting weight loss in 4 919 adults with BMI ≥ 25 met inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses detected no significant effect of social-support-based weight-loss interventions at either 2–4 month or 6-month assessment. There were, however, significant effects at end of intervention [95% CI 0.39, p = 0.04] and at 3-month [95% CI 0.63, p < 0.01] and 6-month [95% CI 0.34, p = 0.05] follow-up. Conclusions: There seem to be a significant effect at the end of intervention and 3- and 6-month follow-up. However, further high-quality studies are needed before drawing any clear conclusions. Trial registration: PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020173696.
KW - Humans
KW - Obesity/therapy
KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
KW - Social Support
KW - Weight Loss
KW - Weight Reduction Programs/methods
U2 - 10.1038/s41366-024-01468-9
DO - 10.1038/s41366-024-01468-9
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38332127
AN - SCOPUS:85184459850
SN - 0307-0565
VL - 48
SP - 599
EP - 611
JO - International Journal of Obesity
JF - International Journal of Obesity
ER -