The Broad vs. the Pointed Brush

Status Change, Stigma and Blame Following Fast Organizational Failure

Agnieska Nowinska, Kristina Vaarst Andersen, Mark Lorenzen

Research output: Contribution to conference without publisher/journalPaperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper explores labor market mechanisms of intra-professional status change following fast organizational failure. We undertake a case study of a collapsed high-profile bunker oil company, selected on account of its failure’s scale, speed, and organizational and geographical heterogeneity. Using unique hand-collected qualitative and quantitative data, we examine the careers of the organization’s displaced employees. At odds with extant theory on stigma, we do not find any general status loss. We explain this by the fast decline and aftermath after bankruptcy of this particular organization, allowing insufficient time for a stigmatization mechanism. We find that displaced employees most prone to status loss are those having worked organizationally and geographically proximately to the locus of the organization’s failure. We suggest that in lieu of stigma, status change is driven by a mechanism of blame, i.e. perceived culpability of those displaced employees with comparatively strong association to organizational failure. Comparing this new theoretical notion with the extant notion of stigma, we suggest that while both are mechanisms compensating for imperfect information, stigma
entails weaker association to failure and hence ‘taints with a broader brush’ compared to blame’s ‘pointed brush’.
Original languageEnglish
Publication date2018
Publication statusPublished - 2018
EventDRUID Conference 2018 - Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark
Duration: 11. Jun 201813. Jun 2018
https://conference.druid.dk/Druid/?confId=57

Conference

ConferenceDRUID Conference 2018
LocationCopenhagen Business School
CountryDenmark
CityCopenhagen
Period11/06/201813/06/2018
Internet address

Cite this

Nowinska, A., Andersen, K. V., & Lorenzen, M. (2018). The Broad vs. the Pointed Brush: Status Change, Stigma and Blame Following Fast Organizational Failure. 1-26. Paper presented at DRUID Conference 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nowinska, Agnieska ; Andersen, Kristina Vaarst ; Lorenzen, Mark. / The Broad vs. the Pointed Brush : Status Change, Stigma and Blame Following Fast Organizational Failure. Paper presented at DRUID Conference 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark.
@conference{cef876a9a49747bf9af4f1736327e3ed,
title = "The Broad vs. the Pointed Brush: Status Change, Stigma and Blame Following Fast Organizational Failure",
abstract = "This paper explores labor market mechanisms of intra-professional status change following fast organizational failure. We undertake a case study of a collapsed high-profile bunker oil company, selected on account of its failure’s scale, speed, and organizational and geographical heterogeneity. Using unique hand-collected qualitative and quantitative data, we examine the careers of the organization’s displaced employees. At odds with extant theory on stigma, we do not find any general status loss. We explain this by the fast decline and aftermath after bankruptcy of this particular organization, allowing insufficient time for a stigmatization mechanism. We find that displaced employees most prone to status loss are those having worked organizationally and geographically proximately to the locus of the organization’s failure. We suggest that in lieu of stigma, status change is driven by a mechanism of blame, i.e. perceived culpability of those displaced employees with comparatively strong association to organizational failure. Comparing this new theoretical notion with the extant notion of stigma, we suggest that while both are mechanisms compensating for imperfect information, stigmaentails weaker association to failure and hence ‘taints with a broader brush’ compared to blame’s ‘pointed brush’.",
author = "Agnieska Nowinska and Andersen, {Kristina Vaarst} and Mark Lorenzen",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
pages = "1--26",
note = "DRUID Conference 2018 ; Conference date: 11-06-2018 Through 13-06-2018",
url = "https://conference.druid.dk/Druid/?confId=57",

}

Nowinska, A, Andersen, KV & Lorenzen, M 2018, 'The Broad vs. the Pointed Brush: Status Change, Stigma and Blame Following Fast Organizational Failure' Paper presented at DRUID Conference 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark, 11/06/2018 - 13/06/2018, pp. 1-26.

The Broad vs. the Pointed Brush : Status Change, Stigma and Blame Following Fast Organizational Failure. / Nowinska, Agnieska; Andersen, Kristina Vaarst; Lorenzen, Mark.

2018. 1-26 Paper presented at DRUID Conference 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Research output: Contribution to conference without publisher/journalPaperResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - The Broad vs. the Pointed Brush

T2 - Status Change, Stigma and Blame Following Fast Organizational Failure

AU - Nowinska, Agnieska

AU - Andersen, Kristina Vaarst

AU - Lorenzen, Mark

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This paper explores labor market mechanisms of intra-professional status change following fast organizational failure. We undertake a case study of a collapsed high-profile bunker oil company, selected on account of its failure’s scale, speed, and organizational and geographical heterogeneity. Using unique hand-collected qualitative and quantitative data, we examine the careers of the organization’s displaced employees. At odds with extant theory on stigma, we do not find any general status loss. We explain this by the fast decline and aftermath after bankruptcy of this particular organization, allowing insufficient time for a stigmatization mechanism. We find that displaced employees most prone to status loss are those having worked organizationally and geographically proximately to the locus of the organization’s failure. We suggest that in lieu of stigma, status change is driven by a mechanism of blame, i.e. perceived culpability of those displaced employees with comparatively strong association to organizational failure. Comparing this new theoretical notion with the extant notion of stigma, we suggest that while both are mechanisms compensating for imperfect information, stigmaentails weaker association to failure and hence ‘taints with a broader brush’ compared to blame’s ‘pointed brush’.

AB - This paper explores labor market mechanisms of intra-professional status change following fast organizational failure. We undertake a case study of a collapsed high-profile bunker oil company, selected on account of its failure’s scale, speed, and organizational and geographical heterogeneity. Using unique hand-collected qualitative and quantitative data, we examine the careers of the organization’s displaced employees. At odds with extant theory on stigma, we do not find any general status loss. We explain this by the fast decline and aftermath after bankruptcy of this particular organization, allowing insufficient time for a stigmatization mechanism. We find that displaced employees most prone to status loss are those having worked organizationally and geographically proximately to the locus of the organization’s failure. We suggest that in lieu of stigma, status change is driven by a mechanism of blame, i.e. perceived culpability of those displaced employees with comparatively strong association to organizational failure. Comparing this new theoretical notion with the extant notion of stigma, we suggest that while both are mechanisms compensating for imperfect information, stigmaentails weaker association to failure and hence ‘taints with a broader brush’ compared to blame’s ‘pointed brush’.

M3 - Paper

SP - 1

EP - 26

ER -

Nowinska A, Andersen KV, Lorenzen M. The Broad vs. the Pointed Brush: Status Change, Stigma and Blame Following Fast Organizational Failure. 2018. Paper presented at DRUID Conference 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark.