The association between Open Dialogue to young Danes in acute psychiatric crisis and their use of health care and social services: A retrospective register-based cohort study

Niels Buus*, Elise Kragh Jacobsen, Anders Bo Bojesen, Aida Bikic, Klaus Müller-Nielsen, Jørgen Aagaard, Annette Erlangsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

107 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Although most mental disorders have their onset in early life, the mental health needs of young people are often not addressed adequately. Open Dialogue is a need-adapted approach that mobilizes psychosocial resources in a crisis struck person's social network. Open Dialogue is organised as a series of network meetings and seeks to promote collaborative integrated care, and a non-directive psychotherapeutic stance. Its effectiveness for young people has not previously been assessed. Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine whether a Danish Open Dialogue approach directed at young people, who sought help from Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services, reduced their utilisation of psychiatric and other health services, compared to peers receiving usual psychiatric treatment. Design: A retrospective register-based cohort study. Methods: Using clinical and national register data, a cohort of patients aged 14–19 years (n = 503) enrolled from one region during 2000 to 2015 were compared to a matched comparison group from two other regions using propensity scores. Utilisation of psychiatric health services, GP services, and social markers were assessed after 1, 2, 5 and 10 year of follow-up using logistic and Poisson regression models. Results: Patients receiving Open Dialogue intervention had more psychiatric outpatient treatments at one year of follow-up (RR = 1.2, CI: 1.1–1.4) than the comparison group, but not at subsequent follow-ups. Recipients of the intervention had fewer emergency psychiatric treatments (1 year follow-up: RR = 0.2, CI: 0.1-0.5; 10 years follow-up: RR = 0.5, CI: 0.3-0.8) and less use of general practitioner services (1 year follow-up: RR = 0.90, CI: 0.82-0.99; 10 years follow-up: RR = 0.85, CI: 0.78-0.92). There was no significant reduction in the number of psychiatric hospitalisation contacts or treatment days. Conclusions: Open Dialogue was significantly associated with some reduced risks of utilising health care services. These mixed results should be tested in a randomized design.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume91
Pages (from-to)119-127
ISSN0020-7489
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1. Mar 2019

Keywords

  • Delivery of health care, integrated
  • Mental health services
  • Psychosocial support systems
  • Psychotherapy
  • Retrospective studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The association between Open Dialogue to young Danes in acute psychiatric crisis and their use of health care and social services: A retrospective register-based cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this