Taking Stock of Built Environment Stock Studies

Progress and Prospects

Maud Lanau, Gang Liu*, Ulrich Kral, Dominik Wiedenhofer, Elisabeth Keijzer, Chang Yu, Christina Ehlert

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Built environment stocks (buildings and infrastructures) play multiple roles in our socio-economic metabolism: they serve as the backbone of modern societies and human well-being, drive the material cycles throughout the economy, entail temporal and spatial lock-ins on energy use and emissions, and represent an extensive reservoir of secondary materials. This review aims at providing a comprehensive and critical review of the state of the art, progress, and prospects of built environment stocks research which has boomed in the past decades. We included 249 publications published from 1985 to 2018, conducted a bibliometric analysis, and assessed the studies by key characteristics including typology of stocks (status of stock and end-use category), type of measurement (object and unit), spatial boundary and level of resolution, and temporal scope. We also highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of different estimation approaches. A comparability analysis of existing studies shows a clearly higher level of stocks per capita and per area in developed countries and cities, confirming the role of urbanization and industrialization in built environment stock growth. However, more spatially refined case studies (e.g., on developing cities and nonresidential buildings) and standardization and improvement of methodology (e.g., with geographic information system and architectural knowledge) and data (e.g., on material intensity and lifetime) would be urgently needed to reveal more robust conclusions on the patterns, drivers, and implications of built environment stocks. Such advanced knowledge on built environment stocks could foster societal and policy agendas such as urban sustainability, circular economy, climate change, and United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume53
Issue number15
Pages (from-to)8499-8515
ISSN0013-936X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6. Aug 2019

Fingerprint

Sustainable development
Metabolism
Climate change
Geographic information systems
Standardization
United Nations
Economics
energy use
standardization
typology
industrialization
urbanization
sustainable development
metabolism
infrastructure
built environment
sustainability
climate change
methodology
material

Cite this

Lanau, Maud ; Liu, Gang ; Kral, Ulrich ; Wiedenhofer, Dominik ; Keijzer, Elisabeth ; Yu, Chang ; Ehlert, Christina. / Taking Stock of Built Environment Stock Studies : Progress and Prospects. In: Environmental Science and Technology. 2019 ; Vol. 53, No. 15. pp. 8499-8515.
@article{fcaa9402fe1c4d61b86c5b5da7147b85,
title = "Taking Stock of Built Environment Stock Studies: Progress and Prospects",
abstract = "Built environment stocks (buildings and infrastructures) play multiple roles in our socio-economic metabolism: they serve as the backbone of modern societies and human well-being, drive the material cycles throughout the economy, entail temporal and spatial lock-ins on energy use and emissions, and represent an extensive reservoir of secondary materials. This review aims at providing a comprehensive and critical review of the state of the art, progress, and prospects of built environment stocks research which has boomed in the past decades. We included 249 publications published from 1985 to 2018, conducted a bibliometric analysis, and assessed the studies by key characteristics including typology of stocks (status of stock and end-use category), type of measurement (object and unit), spatial boundary and level of resolution, and temporal scope. We also highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of different estimation approaches. A comparability analysis of existing studies shows a clearly higher level of stocks per capita and per area in developed countries and cities, confirming the role of urbanization and industrialization in built environment stock growth. However, more spatially refined case studies (e.g., on developing cities and nonresidential buildings) and standardization and improvement of methodology (e.g., with geographic information system and architectural knowledge) and data (e.g., on material intensity and lifetime) would be urgently needed to reveal more robust conclusions on the patterns, drivers, and implications of built environment stocks. Such advanced knowledge on built environment stocks could foster societal and policy agendas such as urban sustainability, circular economy, climate change, and United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals.",
author = "Maud Lanau and Gang Liu and Ulrich Kral and Dominik Wiedenhofer and Elisabeth Keijzer and Chang Yu and Christina Ehlert",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1021/acs.est.8b06652",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "8499--8515",
journal = "Environmental Science & Technology (Washington)",
issn = "0013-936X",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "15",

}

Taking Stock of Built Environment Stock Studies : Progress and Prospects. / Lanau, Maud; Liu, Gang; Kral, Ulrich; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Keijzer, Elisabeth; Yu, Chang; Ehlert, Christina.

In: Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 53, No. 15, 06.08.2019, p. 8499-8515.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taking Stock of Built Environment Stock Studies

T2 - Progress and Prospects

AU - Lanau, Maud

AU - Liu, Gang

AU - Kral, Ulrich

AU - Wiedenhofer, Dominik

AU - Keijzer, Elisabeth

AU - Yu, Chang

AU - Ehlert, Christina

PY - 2019/8/6

Y1 - 2019/8/6

N2 - Built environment stocks (buildings and infrastructures) play multiple roles in our socio-economic metabolism: they serve as the backbone of modern societies and human well-being, drive the material cycles throughout the economy, entail temporal and spatial lock-ins on energy use and emissions, and represent an extensive reservoir of secondary materials. This review aims at providing a comprehensive and critical review of the state of the art, progress, and prospects of built environment stocks research which has boomed in the past decades. We included 249 publications published from 1985 to 2018, conducted a bibliometric analysis, and assessed the studies by key characteristics including typology of stocks (status of stock and end-use category), type of measurement (object and unit), spatial boundary and level of resolution, and temporal scope. We also highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of different estimation approaches. A comparability analysis of existing studies shows a clearly higher level of stocks per capita and per area in developed countries and cities, confirming the role of urbanization and industrialization in built environment stock growth. However, more spatially refined case studies (e.g., on developing cities and nonresidential buildings) and standardization and improvement of methodology (e.g., with geographic information system and architectural knowledge) and data (e.g., on material intensity and lifetime) would be urgently needed to reveal more robust conclusions on the patterns, drivers, and implications of built environment stocks. Such advanced knowledge on built environment stocks could foster societal and policy agendas such as urban sustainability, circular economy, climate change, and United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals.

AB - Built environment stocks (buildings and infrastructures) play multiple roles in our socio-economic metabolism: they serve as the backbone of modern societies and human well-being, drive the material cycles throughout the economy, entail temporal and spatial lock-ins on energy use and emissions, and represent an extensive reservoir of secondary materials. This review aims at providing a comprehensive and critical review of the state of the art, progress, and prospects of built environment stocks research which has boomed in the past decades. We included 249 publications published from 1985 to 2018, conducted a bibliometric analysis, and assessed the studies by key characteristics including typology of stocks (status of stock and end-use category), type of measurement (object and unit), spatial boundary and level of resolution, and temporal scope. We also highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of different estimation approaches. A comparability analysis of existing studies shows a clearly higher level of stocks per capita and per area in developed countries and cities, confirming the role of urbanization and industrialization in built environment stock growth. However, more spatially refined case studies (e.g., on developing cities and nonresidential buildings) and standardization and improvement of methodology (e.g., with geographic information system and architectural knowledge) and data (e.g., on material intensity and lifetime) would be urgently needed to reveal more robust conclusions on the patterns, drivers, and implications of built environment stocks. Such advanced knowledge on built environment stocks could foster societal and policy agendas such as urban sustainability, circular economy, climate change, and United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals.

U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.8b06652

DO - 10.1021/acs.est.8b06652

M3 - Review

VL - 53

SP - 8499

EP - 8515

JO - Environmental Science & Technology (Washington)

JF - Environmental Science & Technology (Washington)

SN - 0013-936X

IS - 15

ER -