Research output per year
Research output per year
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Sustainable management of lakes requires us to overcome ecological, economic, and social challenges. These challenges can be addressed by focusing on achieving ecological improvement within a multifaceted, co-beneficial context. In-lake restoration measures may promote more rapid ecosystem responses than is feasible with catchment measures alone, even if multiple interventions are needed. In particular, we identify restoration methods that support the overarching societal target of a circular economy through the use of nutrients, sediments, or biomass that are removed from a lake, in agriculture, as food, or for biogas production. In this emerging field of sustainable restoration techniques, we show examples, discuss benefits and pitfalls, and flag areas for further research and development. Each lake should be assessed individually to ensure that restoration approaches will effectively address lake-specific problems, do not harm the target lake or downstream ecosystems, are cost-effective, promote delivery of valuable ecosystem services, minimize conflicts in public interests, and eliminate the necessity for repeated interventions. Achieving optimal, sustainable results from lake restoration relies on multidisciplinary research and close interactions between environmental, social, political, and economic sectors. This article is categorized under: Science of Water > Water Quality Water and Life > Stresses and Pressures on Ecosystems Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e1689 |
| Journal | WIREs Water |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| ISSN | 2049-1948 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2024 |
Olga Tammeorg was supported by the Päijät‐Häme Regional Fund of Finnish Cultural Foundation and Maa‐ ja vesitekniikan tuki ry. Estonian Research Council supported Olga Tammeorg and Peeter Nõges by the Grant PRG1167 and Tiina Nõges by the Grant PRG709. Erik Jeppesen was supported by the TÜBITAK program BIDEB2232 (Project 118C250). This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 951963 (TREICLAKE; Tiina Nõges and Erik Jeppesen). Laura H. Härkönen and Seppo Hellsten were supported by the project FRESHABIT LIFE IP (LIFE14/IPE/FI/023) and the European Comission H2020 MERLIN Project (Grant No. 101036337). Hans Paerl was supported by the US National Science Foundation projects 1831096 and 2108917. Kasper Reitzel, Martin Søndergaard, and Christian Skov were supported by the Poul Due Jensen/Grundfos Foundation (2020–068). Bryan Spears was supported by the European Commission H2020 MERLIN Project (Grant No. 101036337), the NERC NC International Net Zero+ project (Grant No. NE/X006247/1), and the Global Environment Facility uP‐Cycle Project (Grant No. 10892). Soila Silvonen was supported by the Lake Vesijärvi Foundation.
Research output: Thesis › Ph.D. thesis