TY - JOUR
T1 - Sustainable lake restoration
T2 - From challenges to solutions
AU - Tammeorg, Olga
AU - Chorus, Ingrid
AU - Spears, Bryan
AU - Nõges, Peeter
AU - Nürnberg, Gertrud K.
AU - Tammeorg, Priit
AU - Søndergaard, Martin
AU - Jeppesen, Erik
AU - Paerl, Hans
AU - Huser, Brian
AU - Horppila, Jukka
AU - Jilbert, Tom
AU - Budzyńska, Agnieszka
AU - Dondajewska-Pielka, Renata
AU - Gołdyn, Ryszard
AU - Haasler, Sina
AU - Hellsten, Seppo
AU - Härkönen, Laura H.
AU - Kiani, Mina
AU - Kozak, Anna
AU - Kotamäki, Niina
AU - Kowalczewska-Madura, Katarzyna
AU - Newell, Silvia
AU - Nurminen, Leena
AU - Nõges, Tiina
AU - Reitzel, Kasper
AU - Rosińska, Joanna
AU - Ruuhijärvi, Jukka
AU - Silvonen, Soila
AU - Skov, Christian
AU - Važić, Tamara
AU - Ventelä, Anne Mari
AU - Waajen, Guido
AU - Lürling, Miquel
N1 - Funding Information:
Olga Tammeorg was supported by the Päijät‐Häme Regional Fund of Finnish Cultural Foundation and Maa‐ ja vesitekniikan tuki ry. Estonian Research Council supported Olga Tammeorg and Peeter Nõges by the Grant PRG1167 and Tiina Nõges by the Grant PRG709. Erik Jeppesen was supported by the TÜBITAK program BIDEB2232 (Project 118C250). This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 951963 (TREICLAKE; Tiina Nõges and Erik Jeppesen). Laura H. Härkönen and Seppo Hellsten were supported by the project FRESHABIT LIFE IP (LIFE14/IPE/FI/023) and the European Comission H2020 MERLIN Project (Grant No. 101036337). Hans Paerl was supported by the US National Science Foundation projects 1831096 and 2108917. Kasper Reitzel, Martin Søndergaard, and Christian Skov were supported by the Poul Due Jensen/Grundfos Foundation (2020–068). Bryan Spears was supported by the European Commission H2020 MERLIN Project (Grant No. 101036337), the NERC NC International Net Zero+ project (Grant No. NE/X006247/1), and the Global Environment Facility uP‐Cycle Project (Grant No. 10892). Soila Silvonen was supported by the Lake Vesijärvi Foundation.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Sustainable management of lakes requires us to overcome ecological, economic, and social challenges. These challenges can be addressed by focusing on achieving ecological improvement within a multifaceted, co-beneficial context. In-lake restoration measures may promote more rapid ecosystem responses than is feasible with catchment measures alone, even if multiple interventions are needed. In particular, we identify restoration methods that support the overarching societal target of a circular economy through the use of nutrients, sediments, or biomass that are removed from a lake, in agriculture, as food, or for biogas production. In this emerging field of sustainable restoration techniques, we show examples, discuss benefits and pitfalls, and flag areas for further research and development. Each lake should be assessed individually to ensure that restoration approaches will effectively address lake-specific problems, do not harm the target lake or downstream ecosystems, are cost-effective, promote delivery of valuable ecosystem services, minimize conflicts in public interests, and eliminate the necessity for repeated interventions. Achieving optimal, sustainable results from lake restoration relies on multidisciplinary research and close interactions between environmental, social, political, and economic sectors. This article is categorized under: Science of Water > Water Quality Water and Life > Stresses and Pressures on Ecosystems Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness.
AB - Sustainable management of lakes requires us to overcome ecological, economic, and social challenges. These challenges can be addressed by focusing on achieving ecological improvement within a multifaceted, co-beneficial context. In-lake restoration measures may promote more rapid ecosystem responses than is feasible with catchment measures alone, even if multiple interventions are needed. In particular, we identify restoration methods that support the overarching societal target of a circular economy through the use of nutrients, sediments, or biomass that are removed from a lake, in agriculture, as food, or for biogas production. In this emerging field of sustainable restoration techniques, we show examples, discuss benefits and pitfalls, and flag areas for further research and development. Each lake should be assessed individually to ensure that restoration approaches will effectively address lake-specific problems, do not harm the target lake or downstream ecosystems, are cost-effective, promote delivery of valuable ecosystem services, minimize conflicts in public interests, and eliminate the necessity for repeated interventions. Achieving optimal, sustainable results from lake restoration relies on multidisciplinary research and close interactions between environmental, social, political, and economic sectors. This article is categorized under: Science of Water > Water Quality Water and Life > Stresses and Pressures on Ecosystems Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness.
KW - cathment and in-lake measures
KW - eutrophication
KW - nutrient recycling
KW - socio-economic benefits
KW - sustainable lake restoration
U2 - 10.1002/wat2.1689
DO - 10.1002/wat2.1689
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85169328774
SN - 2049-1948
VL - 11
JO - WIREs Water
JF - WIREs Water
IS - 2
M1 - e1689
ER -