School Characteristics and Participation in a Smoking Prevention Intervention

Simone Gad Kjeld, Stine Glenstrup Lauemøller, Lisbeth Lund, Anette Andersen, Lotus Sofie Bast

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: We examined whether schools participating in a school-based smoking prevention intervention (X:IT II) differed from other schools in Denmark. Methods: We used national data to compare schools in X:IT II (N = 46) to all other schools nationwide having a 7th grade (N = 1299). Using binary logistic regression analyses, we examined whether school characteristics and measures of pupils' well-being were associated with participation. Results: We found lower odds for participating in X:IT II among private schools compared to public schools (OR = .433, p = .026) and higher odds for participating among schools with many pupils reporting high social well-being (OR = 1.034, p = .023) and low well-being concerning support and inspiration (OR = 1.055, p = .019). Conclusions: Findings suggest that schools in X:IT II are representative in terms of pupil enrollment, proportion of pupils with foreign origin, organizational resources, average grades, academic well-being, and well-being concerning peace and order compared to schools nationwide. On the other hand, type of institution (private vs public), social well-being, and well-being concerning support and inspiration were significantly associated with participation in the intervention. These findings are relevant for guiding future interventions targeting health areas among school children and adolescents.
Original languageEnglish
JournalHealth Behavior and Policy Review
Volume7
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)170-178
ISSN2326-4403
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2020

Keywords

  • school-based interventions
  • school characteristics
  • adolescent health
  • smoking prevention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'School Characteristics and Participation in a Smoking Prevention Intervention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this