Same bank, same clients but different pricing: How do flat-fees for mutual funds affect retail investors

Benjamin Loos, Steffen Meyer*, Charline Uhr, Andreas Hackethal

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to conference without publisher/journalPaperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

What happens when a bank introduces a flat-fee pricing scheme for trading mutual funds to its brokerage clients while leaving everything else unchanged? Only 1.26% of clients adopt the fee scheme. Adopters have been using financial advice and are less prone to inertia. Difference-in-differences analyses of previously advised clients reveal that flat-fee clients seek and follow more advice and improve their portfolio efficiency. A second field experiment, with a large branch bank replicates the main results. We suggest that flat-fees increase trust in advisor quality and reject alternative explanations, like cost-advantages, sunk-cost fallacy, novelty effects or advisor (time) fixed effects.
Original languageEnglish
Publication date2020
Number of pages75
Publication statusPublished - 2020
EventAmerican Finance Association Meetings: 2020 - USA, San Diego
Duration: 2. Jan 20205. Jan 2020

Conference

ConferenceAmerican Finance Association Meetings
LocationUSA
CitySan Diego
Period02/01/202005/01/2020

Keywords

  • Asset allocation
  • Financial Advice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Same bank, same clients but different pricing: How do flat-fees for mutual funds affect retail investors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this