Research integrity among PhD students at the Faculty of Medicine: A comparison of three Scandinavian universities

Bjørn Hofmann*, Lone Bredahl, Mette Brandt Eriksen, Gert Helgesson, Niklas Juth, Søren Holm

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    78 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This study investigates research integrity among PhD students in health sciences at three universities in Scandinavia (Stockholm, Oslo, Odense). A questionnaire with questions on knowledge, attitudes, experiences, and behavior was distributed to PhD students and obtained a response rate of 77.7%. About 10% of the respondents agreed that research misconduct strictly defined (such as fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism, FFP) is common in their area of research, while slightly more agreed that other forms of misconduct is common. A nonnegligible segment of the respondents was willing to fabricate, falsify, or omit contradicting data if they believe that they are right in their overall conclusions. Up to one third reported to have added one or more authors unmerited. Results showed a negative correlation between “good attitudes” and self-reported misconduct and a positive correlation between how frequent respondents thought that misconduct occurs and whether they reported misconduct themselves. This reveals that existing educational and research systems partly fail to foster research integrity.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
    Volume15
    Issue number4
    Pages (from-to)320-329
    ISSN1556-2646
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1. Oct 2020

    Keywords

    • attitudes
    • doctoral students
    • integrity
    • knowledge
    • misconduct
    • practice
    • science ethics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Research integrity among PhD students at the Faculty of Medicine: A comparison of three Scandinavian universities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this