Problems with the Big Five assessment in the World Values Survey

Steven G. Ludeke*, Erik Gahner Larsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Publicly-available data from the World Values Survey (WVS) is an extremely valuable resource for social scientists, serving as the basis for thousands of research publications. The most recent assessment (Wave 6) was the first to assess Big Five personality traits, and this data has already been used in published research. In the present paper, we show for the first time that the Big Five data from WVS Wave 6 is extremely problematic: items from the same trait correlate negatively with each other as often as not, occasionally to truly extreme degrees. Particular caution is warranted for any future research aiming to use this data, as we do not identify any straightforward solution to the data's challenges.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume112
Pages (from-to)103-105
ISSN0191-8869
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • BFI-10
  • Big Five
  • Reliability
  • World Values Survey

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Problems with the Big Five assessment in the World Values Survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this