Prevalence of contact allergy to gold in dermatitis patients from 2010 to 2024: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mikkel Bak Jensen*, Christoffer Kursawe Larsen, Daniel Isufi, Farzad Seyed-Alinaghi, Malin G. Ahlström, Charlotte G. Mortz, Jeanne D. Johansen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

42 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Gold contact allergy is diagnosed by patch testing using gold chloride or gold sodium thiosulfate. These tests often show high positivity rates, but a direct correlation with dermatitis from everyday gold exposure is rare. The aim of this study was to investigate and estimate the current prevalence of gold contact allergy in dermatitis patients. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for studies reporting the prevalence of gold contact allergy in dermatitis patients and published between January 2010 and May 2024. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, and pooled proportions were calculated using random effects models. Sixteen studies with 14 887 dermatitis patients were included. The pooled prevalence of gold contact allergy was 14.1% (95% confidence intervals: 9.5%–19.4%) with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 98.3%). High positivity rates with limited clinical relevance highlight the need for cautious interpretation. Even within the same country, studies find different prevalence rates. Standardized testing protocols and further research are needed to better understand and manage this allergy.

Original languageEnglish
JournalContact Dermatitis
Volume91
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)451-458
ISSN0105-1873
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

Keywords

  • allergic contact dermatitis
  • contact allergy
  • gold
  • gold chloride
  • gold sodium thiosulfate
  • patch test

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence of contact allergy to gold in dermatitis patients from 2010 to 2024: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this