TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of the Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer Patients Using 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT Radiomic Models
AU - Vosoughi, Zahra
AU - Emami, Farshad
AU - Vosoughi, Habibeh
AU - Hajianfar, Ghasem
AU - Hamzian, Nima
AU - Geramifar, Parham
AU - Zaidi, Habib
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Purpose: To predict Gleason Score (GS) using radiomic features from 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT images in primary prostate cancer. Methods: 138 patients undergoing 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT imaging were categorized based on GS, with GS above 4 + 3 as malignant and under 3 + 4 as benign tumors. radiomic features were extracted from tumors’ volume of interest in both PET and CT images, using Feature Elimination with cross-validation. Fusion features were generated by combining features at the feature level; average of features (PET/CTAveFea) or concatenated features (PET/CTConFea). The performance of various models was compared using area under the curve, sensitivity and specificity. Wilcoxon test and F1-score test were used to find the best model. Predictive models were developed for CT-only, PET-only, and PET/CT feature-level fusion models. Results: Random Forest achieved the highest accuracy on CT with 0.74 ± 0.01 AUCMean, 0.75 ± 0.07 sensitivity, and 0.62 ± 0.08 specificity. Logistic regression (LR) exhibited the best predictive performance on PET images with 0.74 ± 0.05 AUCMean, 0.7 ± 0.13 sensitivity, and 0.78 ± 0.14 specificity. The best predictive PET/CTAveFea was achieved by LR, resulting in 0.72 ± 0.07 AUCMean, 0.74 ± 0.12 sensitivity, and 0.63 ± 0.02 specificity. In the case of PET/CTConFea, LR showed the best predictive performance with 0.78 ± 0.08 AUCMean, 0.81 ± 0.09 sensitivity, and 0.66 ± 0.15 specificity. Conclusion: The results demonstrated that radiomic models derived from 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT images could differentiate between benign and malignant tumors based on GS.
AB - Purpose: To predict Gleason Score (GS) using radiomic features from 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT images in primary prostate cancer. Methods: 138 patients undergoing 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT imaging were categorized based on GS, with GS above 4 + 3 as malignant and under 3 + 4 as benign tumors. radiomic features were extracted from tumors’ volume of interest in both PET and CT images, using Feature Elimination with cross-validation. Fusion features were generated by combining features at the feature level; average of features (PET/CTAveFea) or concatenated features (PET/CTConFea). The performance of various models was compared using area under the curve, sensitivity and specificity. Wilcoxon test and F1-score test were used to find the best model. Predictive models were developed for CT-only, PET-only, and PET/CT feature-level fusion models. Results: Random Forest achieved the highest accuracy on CT with 0.74 ± 0.01 AUCMean, 0.75 ± 0.07 sensitivity, and 0.62 ± 0.08 specificity. Logistic regression (LR) exhibited the best predictive performance on PET images with 0.74 ± 0.05 AUCMean, 0.7 ± 0.13 sensitivity, and 0.78 ± 0.14 specificity. The best predictive PET/CTAveFea was achieved by LR, resulting in 0.72 ± 0.07 AUCMean, 0.74 ± 0.12 sensitivity, and 0.63 ± 0.02 specificity. In the case of PET/CTConFea, LR showed the best predictive performance with 0.78 ± 0.08 AUCMean, 0.81 ± 0.09 sensitivity, and 0.66 ± 0.15 specificity. Conclusion: The results demonstrated that radiomic models derived from 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT images could differentiate between benign and malignant tumors based on GS.
KW - Ga-PSMA PET/CT
KW - Gleason Score
KW - Prostate Cancer
KW - Radiomics
U2 - 10.1007/s40846-024-00906-3
DO - 10.1007/s40846-024-00906-3
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85206689004
SN - 1609-0985
VL - 44
SP - 711
EP - 721
JO - Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
JF - Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
IS - 5
ER -