Abstract
In March 2019 the European Union adopted the first pan-European investment screening framework, thus joining the bandwagon of growing investment screening mechanisms around the world. This article explores why the European screening framework was adopted swiftly and with no politicisation, even as the negotiations unfolded against the background of heightened politicisation of trade and investment policy. The paper develops three expectations: (1) converging member state preferences; (2) securitisation of investment policy; and (3) Commission entrepreneurship. It then explores them empirically through process-tracing, drawing on extensive interviews with the actors involved. We argue that the European Commission played a pivotal role. To avoid falling into another strand of politicisation and to defuse political mines, the Commission engaged in a ‘pre-emptive depoliticization’ strategy that shortened the policy process, limited the number of actors involved, and justified the policy options in a legalistic framing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of European Public Policy |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 182-211 |
| ISSN | 1350-1763 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- Depoliticisation; European Commission; FDI; investment screening; ISM
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Pre-emptive depoliticisation: the European Commission and the EU foreign investment screening regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Related research output
- 1 Ph.D. thesis
-
The Geo-Economic Turn in the European Investment Policy Regime: Discourses and Processes of Economic Re-Bordering
Vlasiuk Nibe, A., 4. Oct 2024, Det samfundsvidenskabelige Fakultet. 166 p.Research output: Thesis › Ph.D. thesis
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver