TY - JOUR
T1 - Potential of Radiomics, Dosiomics, and Dose Volume Histograms for Tumor Response Prediction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma following 90Y-SIRT
AU - Mansouri, Zahra
AU - Salimi, Yazdan
AU - Hajianfar, Ghasem
AU - Knappe, Luisa
AU - Wolf, Nicola Bianchetto
AU - Xhepa, Genti
AU - Gleyzolle, Adrien
AU - Ricoeur, Alexis
AU - Garibotto, Valentina
AU - Mainta, Ismini
AU - Zaidi, Habib
PY - 2025/4
Y1 - 2025/4
N2 - Purpose: We evaluate the role of radiomics, dosiomics, and dose-volume constraints (DVCs) in predicting the response of hepatocellular carcinoma to selective internal radiation therapy with 90Y with glass microspheres. Methods: 99mTc-macroagregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) and 90Y SPECT/CT images of 17 patients were included. Tumor responses at three months were evaluated using modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria and patients were categorized as responders or non-responders. Dosimetry was conducted using the local deposition method (Dose) and biologically effective dosimetry. A total of 264 DVCs, 321 radiomic features, and 321 dosiomic features were extracted from the tumor, normal perfused liver (NPL), and whole normal liver (WNL). Five different feature selection methods in combination with eight machine learning algorithms were employed. Model performance was evaluated using area under the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between neither the dose metrics nor radiomicas or dosiomics features of responders and non-responder groups. 90Y-dosiomics models with any given set of inputs outperformed other models. This was also true for 90Y-radiomics from SPECT and SPECT-clinical features, achieving an AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 1. Among MAA-dosiomic and radiomic models, two models showed AUC ≥ 0.91. While the performance of MAA-dose volume histogram (DVH)-based models were less promising, the 90Y-DVH-based models showed strong performance (AUC ≥ 0.91) when considered independently of clinical features. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the potential of 99mTc-MAA and 90Y SPECT-derived radiomics, dosiomics, and dosimetry metrics in establishing predictive models for tumor response.
AB - Purpose: We evaluate the role of radiomics, dosiomics, and dose-volume constraints (DVCs) in predicting the response of hepatocellular carcinoma to selective internal radiation therapy with 90Y with glass microspheres. Methods: 99mTc-macroagregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) and 90Y SPECT/CT images of 17 patients were included. Tumor responses at three months were evaluated using modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria and patients were categorized as responders or non-responders. Dosimetry was conducted using the local deposition method (Dose) and biologically effective dosimetry. A total of 264 DVCs, 321 radiomic features, and 321 dosiomic features were extracted from the tumor, normal perfused liver (NPL), and whole normal liver (WNL). Five different feature selection methods in combination with eight machine learning algorithms were employed. Model performance was evaluated using area under the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between neither the dose metrics nor radiomicas or dosiomics features of responders and non-responder groups. 90Y-dosiomics models with any given set of inputs outperformed other models. This was also true for 90Y-radiomics from SPECT and SPECT-clinical features, achieving an AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 1. Among MAA-dosiomic and radiomic models, two models showed AUC ≥ 0.91. While the performance of MAA-dose volume histogram (DVH)-based models were less promising, the 90Y-DVH-based models showed strong performance (AUC ≥ 0.91) when considered independently of clinical features. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the potential of 99mTc-MAA and 90Y SPECT-derived radiomics, dosiomics, and dosimetry metrics in establishing predictive models for tumor response.
KW - Y-SIRT
KW - Dose–response effect
KW - Dosiomics
KW - Machine learning
KW - Radiomics
KW - SIRT
KW - Radiotherapy Dosage
KW - Humans
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography
KW - Male
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Liver Neoplasms/radiotherapy
KW - Female
KW - Radiometry
KW - Aged
KW - Yttrium Radioisotopes/therapeutic use
KW - Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/radiotherapy
U2 - 10.1007/s11307-025-01992-8
DO - 10.1007/s11307-025-01992-8
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 40064820
AN - SCOPUS:86000732878
SN - 1536-1632
VL - 27
SP - 201
EP - 214
JO - Molecular Imaging and Biology
JF - Molecular Imaging and Biology
IS - 2
ER -