Abstract
Purpose: To examine whether patient involvement using a Patient Decision Aid has a positive effect on pain levels, by giving them an active role in choosing a pain schedule for postoperative pain assessment and pain management. Design: A nonmatched case-control study. Methods: 101 adults 18 years or older were included to choose between 1 of 3 possible schedules for postoperative pain management. Perioperative variables, for example, patients’ assessments of pain were registered at the hospital and further variables after discharge at postoperative day 1 (POD1), POD3, and POD7, for example, patients’ ability to sleep and assessment of nausea. Findings: Less pain after discharge was seen among patients choosing pain schedule II at POD1 (P = .0439). A significantly higher consumption of opioids (P = 0010) on POD1 in patients who have chosen pain schedule II. Conclusions: Improved patient involvement by choosing a user-controlled pain schedule (pain schedule II) in postoperative pain management increased patient empowerment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing |
Volume | 39 |
Issue number | 2 |
Pages (from-to) | 254-262 |
ISSN | 1089-9472 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2024 |
Keywords
- laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- pain
- pain assessment
- patient decision aid
- perioperative
- postoperative
- shared decision-making
- Humans
- Pain Management
- Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
- Laparoscopy
- Case-Control Studies
- Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use
- Adult
- Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy