Postoperative Pain Relief After Ambulatory Laparoscopic Surgery a Nonmatched Case-Control Study

Susanne W. Olsen*, Lene Lehmkuhl, Lone W. Hamborg, Anne Karina A. Torkov, Rie Fog-Nielsen, Jørgen Lauridsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: To examine whether patient involvement using a Patient Decision Aid has a positive effect on pain levels, by giving them an active role in choosing a pain schedule for postoperative pain assessment and pain management. Design: A nonmatched case-control study. Methods: 101 adults 18 years or older were included to choose between 1 of 3 possible schedules for postoperative pain management. Perioperative variables, for example, patients’ assessments of pain were registered at the hospital and further variables after discharge at postoperative day 1 (POD1), POD3, and POD7, for example, patients’ ability to sleep and assessment of nausea. Findings: Less pain after discharge was seen among patients choosing pain schedule II at POD1 (P = .0439). A significantly higher consumption of opioids (P = 0010) on POD1 in patients who have chosen pain schedule II. Conclusions: Improved patient involvement by choosing a user-controlled pain schedule (pain schedule II) in postoperative pain management increased patient empowerment.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing
Volume39
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)254-262
ISSN1089-9472
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024

Keywords

  • laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • pain
  • pain assessment
  • patient decision aid
  • perioperative
  • postoperative
  • shared decision-making
  • Humans
  • Pain Management
  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
  • Laparoscopy
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use
  • Adult
  • Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Postoperative Pain Relief After Ambulatory Laparoscopic Surgery a Nonmatched Case-Control Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this