Poisonous books: analyses of four sixteenth and seventeenth century book bindings covered with arsenic rich green paint

Thomas Delbey, Jakob Povl Holck, Bjarke Jørgensen, Alexandra Alvis, Vanessa Haight Smith, Gwenaelle M. Kavich, Kimberly A Harmon, Bertil F. Dorch, Kaare Lund Rasmussen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

349 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Efforts to read medieval manuscript waste recycled as bookbinding material in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries have resulted in the chemical analysis of four books housed at the University Library of Southern Denmark and the Smithsonian Libraries in Washington DC. Four green coloured book bindings have been investigated by optical microscopy, micro X-ray fluorescence, X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, mass spectroscopy, and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The results show that the green pigments used to obscure the manuscript waste in all four cases contain orpiment (As 2S 3) and indigo (C 16H 11N 2O 2). Although the books were printed in diverse places in Europe—Basel, Bologna, and Lübeck—the styles of their bindings indicate that they were likely bound in the same region in the same period. It is further likely that they acquired their arsenic-rich paint as part of the bookbinding process. Issues concerning the toxicity, health issues for library staff, conservators and researchers handling the books are also addressed.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].

Original languageEnglish
Article number91
JournalHeritage Science
Volume7
Issue number1
ISSN2050-7445
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1. Dec 2019

Keywords

  • Arsenic
  • Book conservation
  • Bookbinding
  • Handling of hazardous material
  • LA-ICP-MS
  • MS
  • Raman
  • Rare books
  • XRD
  • µXRF

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Poisonous books: analyses of four sixteenth and seventeenth century book bindings covered with arsenic rich green paint'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this