Abstract
Systematic reviews with meta-analyses are powerful instruments to synthesize research. If done correctly, they may constitute the highest level of evidence by combining several individual studies. As high-quality evidence is scarce in the field of complementary medicine, meta-analyses of randomized trials may shed new light on both efficacy and safety, but they must be properly conducted. In this commentary to a recently published paper we elaborate on methodological pitfalls in meta-analysis that every researcher should avoid to gain true high-quality evidence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Inflammopharmacology |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 617-618 |
| ISSN | 0925-4692 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2020 |
Keywords
- Evidence synthesis
- Meta-analysis
- Methodology
- Systematic review
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Pitfalls in meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver