Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pitfalls in meta-analysis

  • Andriko Palmowski*
  • , Sabrina M. Nielsen
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Charité - University Medicine Berlin
  • Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Systematic reviews with meta-analyses are powerful instruments to synthesize research. If done correctly, they may constitute the highest level of evidence by combining several individual studies. As high-quality evidence is scarce in the field of complementary medicine, meta-analyses of randomized trials may shed new light on both efficacy and safety, but they must be properly conducted. In this commentary to a recently published paper we elaborate on methodological pitfalls in meta-analysis that every researcher should avoid to gain true high-quality evidence.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInflammopharmacology
Volume28
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)617-618
ISSN0925-4692
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2020

Keywords

  • Evidence synthesis
  • Meta-analysis
  • Methodology
  • Systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pitfalls in meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this