Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Patient-reported outcomes in CodeBreaK 200: Sotorasib versus docetaxel for previously treated advanced NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutation

  • David M. Waterhouse*
  • , Sacha Rothschild
  • , Christophe Dooms
  • , Bertrand Mennecier
  • , Farastuk Bozorgmehr
  • , Margarita Majem
  • , Michel H. van den Heuvel
  • , Helena Linardou
  • , Byoung Chul Cho
  • , Rachel Roberts-Thomson
  • , Kentaro Tanaka
  • , Normand Blais
  • , Gustavo Schvartsman
  • , Karin Holmskov Hansen
  • , Izabela Chmielewska
  • , Martin D. Forster
  • , Christina Giannopoulou
  • , Björn Stollenwerk
  • , Cynthia C. Obiozor
  • , Yang Wang
  • Silvia Novello
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Oncology Hematology Care (OHC)/SCRI Research
  • University of Basel
  • University of Leuven
  • University Hospitals of Strasbourg
  • German Cancer Research Center
  • Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL)
  • Hospital de la Santa Creu in Sant Pau
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Metropolitan Hospital, Athens
  • Severance Hospital
  • The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, North Western Adelaide Health Service
  • Kyushu University Hospital
  • Sainte-Justine University Hospital Research Centre
  • Albert Einstein Hospital
  • Medical University of Lublin
  • UCL Cancer Institute
  • Amgen Incorporated
  • University of Turin

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

62 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: In the CodeBreaK 200 phase III, open-label trial, sotorasib significantly improved efficacy versus docetaxel in previously treated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for global health status, physical functioning, dyspnea, and cough favored sotorasib over docetaxel. Here, we report sotorasib's additional impact on quality of life (QOL). Methods: In CodeBreaK 200, 345 patients who had progressed after prior therapy received sotorasib (960 mg orally daily) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks). Validated questionnaires captured patients’ perception of their QOL and symptom burden for key secondary and exploratory PRO endpoints, including the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Quality-of-life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 (EORTC QLQ-LC13), question GP5 from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Tool General Form (FACT-G GP5), PRO-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), and 5-level EuroQOL-5 dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) including visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). Change from baseline to week 12 was assessed with generalized estimating equations for ordinal outcomes. Results: Patients receiving sotorasib were less bothered by treatment side effects than those receiving docetaxel (odds ratio [OR] 5.7) and experienced symptoms at lower severity (pain: OR 2.9; aching muscles: OR 4.4; aching joints: OR 4.2; mouth or throat sores: OR 4.3). Further, patients’ symptoms interfered less with usual/daily activities (pain: OR 3.2; aching muscles: OR 3.9; aching joints: OR 10.7). QOL remained stable with sotorasib but worsened with docetaxel (change from baseline in EQ-5D VAS score: 1.5 vs –8.4 at cycle 1 day 5 and 2.2 vs –5.8 at week 12). Conclusions: Patients receiving sotorasib reported less severe symptoms than those receiving docetaxel. In addition to improving clinical efficacy outcomes, sotorasib maintained QOL versus docetaxel, suggesting sotorasib may be a more tolerable treatment option for patients with pretreated, KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC.

Original languageEnglish
Article number107921
JournalLung Cancer
Volume196
Number of pages12
ISSN0169-5002
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024

Keywords

  • Quality of life
  • Side effects
  • Symptom burden

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient-reported outcomes in CodeBreaK 200: Sotorasib versus docetaxel for previously treated advanced NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this