Patient- and clinician- reported outcome in eating disorders

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome is increasingly applied in health sciences. Patients with eating disorders (EDs) characteristically have a different opinion of their needs to that of the health professionals, which can lead to ambivalence towards treatment and immense compliance difficulties. This cross-sectional study compared data assessed by the clinician to patient-reported measures in patients with a history of EDs. We included data from a cohort of patients with EDs (n=544) referred to a specialized ED unit in Denmark. Patient-reported measures included the Eating Disorder Inventory-2 (EDI-2) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36), and clinical data included remission status and body mass index (BMI). We found a positive association between BMI and EDI-2 scores for anorexia nervosa (AN) and eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS), reflecting increasing ED symptomatology with increasing BMI. This association was not observed in bulimia nervosa (BN). We did not find a correlation between SF-36 scores and BMI in any of the diagnostic groups.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume247
Pages (from-to)230-235
ISSN0165-1781
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient- and clinician- reported outcome in eating disorders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this