Abstract
Much of paleodemography, an interdisciplinary field with strong ties to archaeology, among other disciplines, is oriented toward clarifying the life experiences of past people and why they changed over time. We focus on how human skeletons contribute to our understanding of preindustrial demographic regimes, including when changes took place that led to the world as we know it today. Problems with existing paleodemographic practices are highlighted, as are promising directions for future work. The latter requires both better age estimates and innovative methods to handle data appropriately. Age-at-death estimates for adult skeletons are a particular problem, especially for adults over 50 years that undoubtedly are mistakenly underrepresented in published studies of archaeological skeletons. Better age estimates for the entirety of the lifespan are essential to generate realistic distributions of age at death. There are currently encouraging signs that after about a half-century of intensive, and sometimes contentious, research, paleodemography is poised to contribute much to understandings of evolutionary processes, the structure of past populations, and human-disease interaction, among other topics.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | The American Journal of Biological Anthropology |
Volume | 178 |
Issue number | S74 |
Pages (from-to) | 115-150 |
ISSN | 2692-7691 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1. Aug 2022 |
Keywords
- Adult
- Age Determination by Skeleton/methods
- Archaeology
- Biological Evolution
- Humans
- Longevity
- Middle Aged
- Skeleton