Older Patients' experiences of Shared Decision-making when choosing treatment for their distal radius fracture: A Qualitative Study

Louise Marie Nøhr, Ane Simony*, Charlotte Abrahamsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to understand how older patients experience shared decision-making (SDM) when making decisions about the treatment of their distal radius fracture (DRF). Methods: An exploratory qualitative study was designed using individual in-person and telephone interviews. Twelve DRF patients were recruited during their first follow-up visit to a Danish outpatient clinic, with ten of them participating in interviews. Data was analysed using content analysis. Results: Three themes emerged: 1) An acute situation, 2) Considerations influencing the treatment choice and 3) The treatment decision. Conclusion: In conclusion, our study represents a pioneering effort in reporting the use of Shared Decision Making in fracture management. The sudden onset of DRF proved to be highly distressing for the patients. Providing SDM material to patients in the Emergency department (ED) aimed to empower them and prepare them for their subsequent outpatient clinic visit. However, its effectiveness varied. The demeanour of doctors played a crucial role in shaping patient experiences.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101153
JournalInternational Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing
Volume56
Number of pages6
ISSN1878-1241
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

Keywords

  • Distal radius fracture
  • Patients perspective
  • Qualitative
  • Shared decision-making

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Older Patients' experiences of Shared Decision-making when choosing treatment for their distal radius fracture: A Qualitative Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this