Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping to guide targeted anti-D prophylaxis-an external quality assessment workshop

  • Frederik Banch Clausen
  • , Angela Natalie Barrett
  • , Noninvasive Fetal RHD Genotyping EQA2017 Working Group
  • , Mette Christiansen (Member of author group)
  • , Marianne Antonius Jakobsen (Member of author group)
  • , Rudi Steffensen (Member of author group)
  • , Anne Sølling Sørensen (Member of author group)
  • , Helle Wulf-Johansson (Member of author group)
  • , Morten Hanefeld Dziegiel (Member of author group)
  • National University of Singapore
  • Rigshospitalet
  • Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Aalborg University
  • Aalborg University Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

497 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fetal RHD genotyping of cell-free fetal DNA from RhD-negative pregnant women can be used to guide targeted antenatal and postnatal anti-D prophylaxis for the prevention of RhD immunization. To assure the quality of clinical testing, we conducted an external quality assessment workshop with the participation of 28 laboratories.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aliquots of pooled maternal plasma were sent to each laboratory. One sample was positive, and the second sample was negative for fetal RHD, verified by pre-workshop testing using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis of RHD exons 4, 5, 7 and 10. Plasma samples were shipped at room temperature. A reporting scheme was supplied for data collection, including questions regarding the methodological setup, results and clinical recommendations. Different methodological approaches were used, all employing qPCR with a total of eight different combinations of RHD exon targets. The samples were tested blindly.

RESULTS: Fetal RHD genotyping was performed with no false-negative and no false-positive results. One inconclusive result was reported for the RHD-positive sample, and four inconclusive results were reported for the RHD-negative sample. All clinical conclusions were satisfactory.

CONCLUSION: This external quality assessment workshop demonstrates that despite the different approaches taken to perform the clinical assays, fetal RHD genotyping is a reliable laboratory assay to guide targeted use of Rh prophylaxis in a clinical setting.

Original languageEnglish
JournalVox Sanguinis
Volume114
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)386-393
ISSN0042-9007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2019

Keywords

  • Education, Continuing
  • Exons
  • Female
  • Fetal Diseases/genetics
  • Fetus
  • Genotype
  • Humans
  • Pregnancy
  • Prenatal Diagnosis/methods
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care
  • Quality Control
  • Quality of Health Care
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Rh Isoimmunization/genetics
  • Rh-Hr Blood-Group System/blood
  • Rho(D) Immune Globulin/blood
  • Rh prophylaxis
  • cell-free fetal DNA
  • fetal RHD genotyping
  • external quality assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping to guide targeted anti-D prophylaxis-an external quality assessment workshop'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this