Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Non-specific effects of vaccines: Current evidence and potential implications

  • Charlotte L.C.J. de Bree
  • , Valerie A.C.M. Koeken
  • , Leo A.B. Joosten
  • , Peter Aaby
  • , Christine Stabell Benn
  • , Reinout van Crevel
  • , Mihai G. Netea*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • University of Bonn
  • Statens Serum Institut

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Besides protection against specific microorganisms, vaccines can induce heterologous or non-specific effects (NSE). Epidemiological data suggest that vaccination with live-attenuated vaccines such as Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), measles vaccine, and oral polio vaccine results in increased overall childhood survival, and several of these observations have been confirmed in randomized trials. Immunological mechanisms mediating NSE include heterologous lymphocyte effects and induction of innate immune memory (trained immunity). Trained immunity induces long-term functional upregulation of innate immune cells through epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming. An overview of the epidemiological evidence of non-specific effects of vaccines and the latest insights regarding the biological mechanisms behind this phenomenon is presented, and future research priorities and potential implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSeminars in Immunology
Volume39
Pages (from-to)35-43
ISSN1044-5323
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

Funding

MGN was supported by an ERC Consolidator Grant ( #310372 ) and a Spinoza Grant of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research . CVIVA is supported by a grant from the Danish national Research Foundation ( DNRF108 ).

Keywords

  • Heterologous protection
  • Morbidity
  • Mortality
  • Non-specific effects
  • Trained immunity
  • Vaccines

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Non-specific effects of vaccines: Current evidence and potential implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this