Abstract
This preprint introduces Navigational Epistemics, a field developed to explain how agents reason and act competently in complex, emergent, and postdisciplinary knowledge environments. In settings shaped by Darwinian contingency, distributed and anarchic system dynamics, and nonlinear change, traditional method first models of justification fail to provide adequate guidance. Navigational Epistemics reframes knowledge work as an activity of navigation across heterogeneous epistemic regimes rather than the application of predetermined procedures.
At the center of this field, the Epistemology of Competent Action offers a programmatic account of how competence emerges as an epistemic achievement grounded in judgment, contextual interpretation, regime coordination, and reflexive recalibration. The mechanism, sometimes described as Mode 3, is the process within ECA that captures how agents select, integrate, and adjust justificatory resources as situations evolve, producing an epistemic stance suited to the environment.
The architecture articulated here, including knowledge regimes, epistemic judgment, navigational reflexivity, the gradient of epistemic stability, and the ENACT norms, clarifies how responsible and context sensitive action becomes possible when stability cannot be presumed. The framework provides a unified account of interdisciplinarity, competence formation, professional reasoning, and postdisciplinary education, offering a coherent epistemology for twenty first century knowledge work.
At the center of this field, the Epistemology of Competent Action offers a programmatic account of how competence emerges as an epistemic achievement grounded in judgment, contextual interpretation, regime coordination, and reflexive recalibration. The mechanism, sometimes described as Mode 3, is the process within ECA that captures how agents select, integrate, and adjust justificatory resources as situations evolve, producing an epistemic stance suited to the environment.
The architecture articulated here, including knowledge regimes, epistemic judgment, navigational reflexivity, the gradient of epistemic stability, and the ENACT norms, clarifies how responsible and context sensitive action becomes possible when stability cannot be presumed. The framework provides a unified account of interdisciplinarity, competence formation, professional reasoning, and postdisciplinary education, offering a coherent epistemology for twenty first century knowledge work.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Zenodo |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2. Apr 2026 |
Keywords
- Navigational Epistemics
- Epistemology of Competent Action
- Epistemic judgment
- Navigational reflexivity
- Knowledge regimes
- Regime palette
- Gradient of epistemic stability
- Contextual justification
- ENACT norms
- Competence
- Complexity
- Postdisciplinary
- Judgment-based knowledge creation
- Emergence
- Darwinian contingency
- Distributed order
- Professional reasoning
- Interdisciplinarity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Navigational Epistemics: Epistemology of Competent Action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver