Multiple modernities, modern subjectivities and social order: Unity and difference in the rise of Islamic modernities

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Taking its point of departure in the conceptual debate about modernities in the plural, this article presents a heuristic framework based on an interpretative approach to modernity. The article draws on theories of multiple modernities, successive modernities and poststructuralist approaches to modern subjectivity formation. In combining conceptual tools from these strands of social theory, we argue that the emergence of multiple modernities should be understood as a historical result of idiosyncratic social constructions combining global social imaginaries with religious and other cultural traditions. In the second part of the article we illustrate this argument with three short excursions into the history of Islamic reform in the 19th and 20th centuries. In this way we interpret the modern history of Muslim societies as based on cultural conflicts between different forms of social order and individual identities similar to those present in European history. Contrary to the European experience, however, religious traditions gradually assumed an important role in defining ‘authentic’ Muslim modernities, leading to a relatively hegemonic role of so-called Islamic modernities toward the end of the 20th century.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalThesis Eleven
    Volume130
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)22-42
    ISSN0725-5136
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1. Oct 2015

    Keywords

    • Islamic modernities
    • Islamic reform
    • modern subjectivity
    • modernity
    • multiple modernities
    • social order

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Multiple modernities, modern subjectivities and social order: Unity and difference in the rise of Islamic modernities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this