Movement behavior profiles and obesity

a latent profile analysis of 24-h time-use composition among Danish workers

Nidhi Gupta, David M Hallman, Dorothea Dumuid, Akshay Vij, Charlotte Lund Rasmussen, Marie Birk Jørgensen, Andreas Holtermann

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: An element of obesity prevention is increasing total physical activity energy expenditure. However, this approach does not incorporate the balance of various movement behaviors-physical activity, sedentary behaviors and sleep-across domains of the day. We aimed to identify time-use profiles over work and leisure, termed 'movement behavior profiles' and to investigate their association with obesity.

SUBJECTS/METHODS: Eight-hundred-and-seven workers completed (a) thigh accelerometry and diaries to determine their 24-h composition of behaviors (sedentary and standing, light physical activity and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at work and leisure, and time in bed) and (b) obesity measurements. Movement behavior profiles were determined using latent profile analyses of isometric log-ratios of the 24-h composition, and labeled according to animal movement behavior traits. Linear models were applied to determine the association between profiles and obesity.

RESULTS: Four profiles were identified, labeled as "Chimpanzees" (n = 226), "Lions" (n = 179), "Ants" (n = 244), and "Koalas" (n = 158). "Chimpanzees" work time was evenly distributed between behaviors while their leisure time was predominantly active. Compared to Chimpanzees, "Lions" were more active at work and sedentary during leisure and spent more time in bed; "Ants" were more active at work and during leisure; "Koalas" were more sedentary at work and leisure and spent similar time in bed. With "Chimpanzees" as reference, "Lions" had least favorable obesity indicators: +2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6, 3.4) %body fat, +4.3 cm (1.4, 7.3) waist circumference and +1.0 (2.0, 0.0) Body Mass Index (BMI), followed by "Koalas" +2.0 (0.4, 3.7) %body fat, +3.1 cm (0.1, 6.0) waist circumference, and +0.8 (-0.30, 1.94) BMI. No significant differences were found between "Chimpanzees" and "Ants".

CONCLUSIONS: Movement behavior profiles across work and leisure time-use compositions are associated with obesity. Achieving adequate balance between work and leisure movement behaviors should be further investigated as a potential obesity prevention strategy.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Obesity
ISSN0307-0565
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24. Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Leisure Activities
Pan troglodytes
Phascolarctidae
Lions
Adipose Tissue
Body Mass Index
Energy Metabolism
Linear Models
Confidence Intervals

Cite this

Gupta, Nidhi ; Hallman, David M ; Dumuid, Dorothea ; Vij, Akshay ; Rasmussen, Charlotte Lund ; Jørgensen, Marie Birk ; Holtermann, Andreas. / Movement behavior profiles and obesity : a latent profile analysis of 24-h time-use composition among Danish workers. In: International Journal of Obesity. 2019.
@article{439668e35fd1493bada88e546ce79fa8,
title = "Movement behavior profiles and obesity: a latent profile analysis of 24-h time-use composition among Danish workers",
abstract = "BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: An element of obesity prevention is increasing total physical activity energy expenditure. However, this approach does not incorporate the balance of various movement behaviors-physical activity, sedentary behaviors and sleep-across domains of the day. We aimed to identify time-use profiles over work and leisure, termed 'movement behavior profiles' and to investigate their association with obesity.SUBJECTS/METHODS: Eight-hundred-and-seven workers completed (a) thigh accelerometry and diaries to determine their 24-h composition of behaviors (sedentary and standing, light physical activity and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at work and leisure, and time in bed) and (b) obesity measurements. Movement behavior profiles were determined using latent profile analyses of isometric log-ratios of the 24-h composition, and labeled according to animal movement behavior traits. Linear models were applied to determine the association between profiles and obesity.RESULTS: Four profiles were identified, labeled as {"}Chimpanzees{"} (n = 226), {"}Lions{"} (n = 179), {"}Ants{"} (n = 244), and {"}Koalas{"} (n = 158). {"}Chimpanzees{"} work time was evenly distributed between behaviors while their leisure time was predominantly active. Compared to Chimpanzees, {"}Lions{"} were more active at work and sedentary during leisure and spent more time in bed; {"}Ants{"} were more active at work and during leisure; {"}Koalas{"} were more sedentary at work and leisure and spent similar time in bed. With {"}Chimpanzees{"} as reference, {"}Lions{"} had least favorable obesity indicators: +2.0 (95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 0.6, 3.4) {\%}body fat, +4.3 cm (1.4, 7.3) waist circumference and +1.0 (2.0, 0.0) Body Mass Index (BMI), followed by {"}Koalas{"} +2.0 (0.4, 3.7) {\%}body fat, +3.1 cm (0.1, 6.0) waist circumference, and +0.8 (-0.30, 1.94) BMI. No significant differences were found between {"}Chimpanzees{"} and {"}Ants{"}.CONCLUSIONS: Movement behavior profiles across work and leisure time-use compositions are associated with obesity. Achieving adequate balance between work and leisure movement behaviors should be further investigated as a potential obesity prevention strategy.",
author = "Nidhi Gupta and Hallman, {David M} and Dorothea Dumuid and Akshay Vij and Rasmussen, {Charlotte Lund} and J{\o}rgensen, {Marie Birk} and Andreas Holtermann",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1038/s41366-019-0419-8",
language = "English",
journal = "International Journal of Obesity",
issn = "0307-0565",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

Movement behavior profiles and obesity : a latent profile analysis of 24-h time-use composition among Danish workers. / Gupta, Nidhi; Hallman, David M; Dumuid, Dorothea; Vij, Akshay; Rasmussen, Charlotte Lund; Jørgensen, Marie Birk; Holtermann, Andreas.

In: International Journal of Obesity, 24.07.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Movement behavior profiles and obesity

T2 - a latent profile analysis of 24-h time-use composition among Danish workers

AU - Gupta, Nidhi

AU - Hallman, David M

AU - Dumuid, Dorothea

AU - Vij, Akshay

AU - Rasmussen, Charlotte Lund

AU - Jørgensen, Marie Birk

AU - Holtermann, Andreas

PY - 2019/7/24

Y1 - 2019/7/24

N2 - BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: An element of obesity prevention is increasing total physical activity energy expenditure. However, this approach does not incorporate the balance of various movement behaviors-physical activity, sedentary behaviors and sleep-across domains of the day. We aimed to identify time-use profiles over work and leisure, termed 'movement behavior profiles' and to investigate their association with obesity.SUBJECTS/METHODS: Eight-hundred-and-seven workers completed (a) thigh accelerometry and diaries to determine their 24-h composition of behaviors (sedentary and standing, light physical activity and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at work and leisure, and time in bed) and (b) obesity measurements. Movement behavior profiles were determined using latent profile analyses of isometric log-ratios of the 24-h composition, and labeled according to animal movement behavior traits. Linear models were applied to determine the association between profiles and obesity.RESULTS: Four profiles were identified, labeled as "Chimpanzees" (n = 226), "Lions" (n = 179), "Ants" (n = 244), and "Koalas" (n = 158). "Chimpanzees" work time was evenly distributed between behaviors while their leisure time was predominantly active. Compared to Chimpanzees, "Lions" were more active at work and sedentary during leisure and spent more time in bed; "Ants" were more active at work and during leisure; "Koalas" were more sedentary at work and leisure and spent similar time in bed. With "Chimpanzees" as reference, "Lions" had least favorable obesity indicators: +2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6, 3.4) %body fat, +4.3 cm (1.4, 7.3) waist circumference and +1.0 (2.0, 0.0) Body Mass Index (BMI), followed by "Koalas" +2.0 (0.4, 3.7) %body fat, +3.1 cm (0.1, 6.0) waist circumference, and +0.8 (-0.30, 1.94) BMI. No significant differences were found between "Chimpanzees" and "Ants".CONCLUSIONS: Movement behavior profiles across work and leisure time-use compositions are associated with obesity. Achieving adequate balance between work and leisure movement behaviors should be further investigated as a potential obesity prevention strategy.

AB - BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: An element of obesity prevention is increasing total physical activity energy expenditure. However, this approach does not incorporate the balance of various movement behaviors-physical activity, sedentary behaviors and sleep-across domains of the day. We aimed to identify time-use profiles over work and leisure, termed 'movement behavior profiles' and to investigate their association with obesity.SUBJECTS/METHODS: Eight-hundred-and-seven workers completed (a) thigh accelerometry and diaries to determine their 24-h composition of behaviors (sedentary and standing, light physical activity and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at work and leisure, and time in bed) and (b) obesity measurements. Movement behavior profiles were determined using latent profile analyses of isometric log-ratios of the 24-h composition, and labeled according to animal movement behavior traits. Linear models were applied to determine the association between profiles and obesity.RESULTS: Four profiles were identified, labeled as "Chimpanzees" (n = 226), "Lions" (n = 179), "Ants" (n = 244), and "Koalas" (n = 158). "Chimpanzees" work time was evenly distributed between behaviors while their leisure time was predominantly active. Compared to Chimpanzees, "Lions" were more active at work and sedentary during leisure and spent more time in bed; "Ants" were more active at work and during leisure; "Koalas" were more sedentary at work and leisure and spent similar time in bed. With "Chimpanzees" as reference, "Lions" had least favorable obesity indicators: +2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6, 3.4) %body fat, +4.3 cm (1.4, 7.3) waist circumference and +1.0 (2.0, 0.0) Body Mass Index (BMI), followed by "Koalas" +2.0 (0.4, 3.7) %body fat, +3.1 cm (0.1, 6.0) waist circumference, and +0.8 (-0.30, 1.94) BMI. No significant differences were found between "Chimpanzees" and "Ants".CONCLUSIONS: Movement behavior profiles across work and leisure time-use compositions are associated with obesity. Achieving adequate balance between work and leisure movement behaviors should be further investigated as a potential obesity prevention strategy.

U2 - 10.1038/s41366-019-0419-8

DO - 10.1038/s41366-019-0419-8

M3 - Journal article

JO - International Journal of Obesity

JF - International Journal of Obesity

SN - 0307-0565

ER -