Materiality in probes: Three perspectives for co-exploring patient democracy

Eva Knutz, Thomas Markussen, Signe Mårbjerg Thomsen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The overall aim of this paper is to increase designers’ understanding
of how materiality can be of value in probing. Initially, we position
ourselves in relation to existing approaches to probing. Hereafter, we
introduce three different theoretical perspectives on materiality in
order to make some useful conceptual distinctions. The explanatory
strength of each perspective is then exemplified through a case study,
where probing was used extensively as a method of co-exploring
cancer patients’ individual and social needs. The contribution of
the paper lies in offering a detailed understanding of how the
materialising of probes can be used as different modes of inquiry
in co-exploring activities. Through these, we define a more holistic
picture of the cancer patient in a societal context both as individual, as
family member, as patient and as citizen, in relation to how individual
participation in own treatment might be configured.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts
Volume15
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)142-162
ISSN1571-0882
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Materiality
Democracy
Cancer Patients
Designer
Social Needs

Keywords

  • Probing, Co-Exploring, Social Design, Patient-Centred Care
  • probing
  • Materiality
  • design for well-being
  • design & democracy
  • material participation

Cite this

@article{6332433dbf6946aaa6805752ef922794,
title = "Materiality in probes: Three perspectives for co-exploring patient democracy",
abstract = "The overall aim of this paper is to increase designers’ understandingof how materiality can be of value in probing. Initially, we positionourselves in relation to existing approaches to probing. Hereafter, weintroduce three different theoretical perspectives on materiality inorder to make some useful conceptual distinctions. The explanatorystrength of each perspective is then exemplified through a case study,where probing was used extensively as a method of co-exploringcancer patients’ individual and social needs. The contribution ofthe paper lies in offering a detailed understanding of how thematerialising of probes can be used as different modes of inquiryin co-exploring activities. Through these, we define a more holisticpicture of the cancer patient in a societal context both as individual, asfamily member, as patient and as citizen, in relation to how individualparticipation in own treatment might be configured.",
keywords = "Probing, Co-Exploring, Social Design, Patient-Centred Care, probing, Materiality, design for well-being, design & democracy, material participation",
author = "Eva Knutz and Thomas Markussen and {M{\aa}rbjerg Thomsen}, Signe",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/15710882.2018.1445759",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "142--162",
journal = "CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts",
issn = "1571-0882",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Materiality in probes : Three perspectives for co-exploring patient democracy. / Knutz, Eva ; Markussen, Thomas; Mårbjerg Thomsen, Signe .

In: CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2019, p. 142-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Materiality in probes

T2 - Three perspectives for co-exploring patient democracy

AU - Knutz, Eva

AU - Markussen, Thomas

AU - Mårbjerg Thomsen, Signe

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The overall aim of this paper is to increase designers’ understandingof how materiality can be of value in probing. Initially, we positionourselves in relation to existing approaches to probing. Hereafter, weintroduce three different theoretical perspectives on materiality inorder to make some useful conceptual distinctions. The explanatorystrength of each perspective is then exemplified through a case study,where probing was used extensively as a method of co-exploringcancer patients’ individual and social needs. The contribution ofthe paper lies in offering a detailed understanding of how thematerialising of probes can be used as different modes of inquiryin co-exploring activities. Through these, we define a more holisticpicture of the cancer patient in a societal context both as individual, asfamily member, as patient and as citizen, in relation to how individualparticipation in own treatment might be configured.

AB - The overall aim of this paper is to increase designers’ understandingof how materiality can be of value in probing. Initially, we positionourselves in relation to existing approaches to probing. Hereafter, weintroduce three different theoretical perspectives on materiality inorder to make some useful conceptual distinctions. The explanatorystrength of each perspective is then exemplified through a case study,where probing was used extensively as a method of co-exploringcancer patients’ individual and social needs. The contribution ofthe paper lies in offering a detailed understanding of how thematerialising of probes can be used as different modes of inquiryin co-exploring activities. Through these, we define a more holisticpicture of the cancer patient in a societal context both as individual, asfamily member, as patient and as citizen, in relation to how individualparticipation in own treatment might be configured.

KW - Probing, Co-Exploring, Social Design, Patient-Centred Care

KW - probing

KW - Materiality

KW - design for well-being

KW - design & democracy

KW - material participation

U2 - 10.1080/15710882.2018.1445759

DO - 10.1080/15710882.2018.1445759

M3 - Journal article

VL - 15

SP - 142

EP - 162

JO - CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts

JF - CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts

SN - 1571-0882

IS - 2

ER -