TY - JOUR
T1 - Management Measures and Trends of Biological Invasions in Europe
T2 - A Survey-Based Assessment of Local Managers
AU - Garcia-Lozano, Carla
AU - Pueyo-Ros, Josep
AU - Canelles, Quim
AU - Latombe, Guillaume
AU - Adriaens, Tim
AU - Bacher, Sven
AU - Cardoso, Ana Cristina
AU - Cleary, Michelle
AU - Coromina, Lluís
AU - Courchamp, Franck
AU - Dawson, Wayne
AU - de Groot, Maarten
AU - Essl, Franz
AU - Gallardo, Belinda
AU - Golivets, Marina
AU - Huusela, Erja
AU - Jauni, Miia
AU - Jelaska, Sven D.
AU - Jeschke, Jonathan M.
AU - Katsanevakis, Stelios
AU - Kourantidou, Melina
AU - Kühn, Ingolf
AU - Lenzner, Bernd
AU - Leung, Brian
AU - Marchante, Elizabete
AU - O'Flynn, Colette
AU - Pérez-Granados, Cristian
AU - Pergl, Jan
AU - Pipek, Pavel
AU - Preda, Cristina
AU - Ribeiro, Filipe
AU - Roy, Helen
AU - Scalera, Riccardo
AU - von Schmalensee, Menja
AU - Seebens, Hanno
AU - Stefánsson, Róbert A.
AU - Tokarska-Guzik, Barbara
AU - Tricarico, Elena
AU - Vanderhoeven, Sonia
AU - Vandvik, Vigdis
AU - Vilà, Montserrat
AU - Roura-Pascual, Núria
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Biological invasions are a major threat to biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and nature's contributions to people worldwide. However, the effectiveness of invasive alien species (IAS) management measures and the progress toward achieving biodiversity targets remain uncertain due to limited and nonuniform data availability. Management success is usually assessed at a local level and documented in technical reports, often written in languages other than English, which makes such data notoriously difficult to collect at large geographic scales. Here we present the first European assessment of how managers perceive trends in IAS and the effectiveness of management measures to mitigate biological invasions. We developed a structured questionnaire translated into 18 languages and disseminated it to local and regional managers of IAS in Europe. We received responses from 1928 participants from 41 European countries, including 24 European Union (EU) Member States. Our results reveal substantial efforts in IAS monitoring and control, with invasive plants being the primary focus. Yet, there is a general perception of an increase in the numbers, occupied areas, and impacts of IAS across environment and taxonomic groups, particularly plants, over time. This perceived increase is consistent across both EU and non-EU countries, with respondents from EU countries demonstrating more certainty in their responses. Our results also indicate a lack of data on alien vertebrates and invertebrates, reflecting a need for more targeted monitoring and knowledge sharing between managers and policymakers and between countries. Overall, our study suggests that Europe's current strategies are insufficient to substantially reduce IAS by 2030 and hence to meet the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework target.
AB - Biological invasions are a major threat to biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and nature's contributions to people worldwide. However, the effectiveness of invasive alien species (IAS) management measures and the progress toward achieving biodiversity targets remain uncertain due to limited and nonuniform data availability. Management success is usually assessed at a local level and documented in technical reports, often written in languages other than English, which makes such data notoriously difficult to collect at large geographic scales. Here we present the first European assessment of how managers perceive trends in IAS and the effectiveness of management measures to mitigate biological invasions. We developed a structured questionnaire translated into 18 languages and disseminated it to local and regional managers of IAS in Europe. We received responses from 1928 participants from 41 European countries, including 24 European Union (EU) Member States. Our results reveal substantial efforts in IAS monitoring and control, with invasive plants being the primary focus. Yet, there is a general perception of an increase in the numbers, occupied areas, and impacts of IAS across environment and taxonomic groups, particularly plants, over time. This perceived increase is consistent across both EU and non-EU countries, with respondents from EU countries demonstrating more certainty in their responses. Our results also indicate a lack of data on alien vertebrates and invertebrates, reflecting a need for more targeted monitoring and knowledge sharing between managers and policymakers and between countries. Overall, our study suggests that Europe's current strategies are insufficient to substantially reduce IAS by 2030 and hence to meet the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework target.
KW - environmental perception
KW - exotic species
KW - expert survey
KW - invasive alien species
KW - management practices
KW - non-native species
KW - policy
U2 - 10.1111/gcb.70028
DO - 10.1111/gcb.70028
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39825587
SN - 1354-1013
VL - 31
JO - Global Change Biology
JF - Global Change Biology
IS - 1
M1 - e70028
ER -