Management Measures and Trends of Biological Invasions in Europe: A Survey-Based Assessment of Local Managers

Carla Garcia-Lozano, Josep Pueyo-Ros, Quim Canelles, Guillaume Latombe, Tim Adriaens, Sven Bacher, Ana Cristina Cardoso, Michelle Cleary, Lluís Coromina, Franck Courchamp, Wayne Dawson, Maarten de Groot, Franz Essl, Belinda Gallardo, Marina Golivets, Erja Huusela, Miia Jauni, Sven D. Jelaska, Jonathan M. Jeschke, Stelios KatsanevakisMelina Kourantidou, Ingolf Kühn, Bernd Lenzner, Brian Leung, Elizabete Marchante, Colette O'Flynn, Cristian Pérez-Granados, Jan Pergl, Pavel Pipek, Cristina Preda, Filipe Ribeiro, Helen Roy, Riccardo Scalera, Menja von Schmalensee, Hanno Seebens, Róbert A. Stefánsson, Barbara Tokarska-Guzik, Elena Tricarico, Sonia Vanderhoeven, Vigdis Vandvik, Montserrat Vilà, Núria Roura-Pascual*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Biological invasions are a major threat to biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and nature's contributions to people worldwide. However, the effectiveness of invasive alien species (IAS) management measures and the progress toward achieving biodiversity targets remain uncertain due to limited and nonuniform data availability. Management success is usually assessed at a local level and documented in technical reports, often written in languages other than English, which makes such data notoriously difficult to collect at large geographic scales. Here we present the first European assessment of how managers perceive trends in IAS and the effectiveness of management measures to mitigate biological invasions. We developed a structured questionnaire translated into 18 languages and disseminated it to local and regional managers of IAS in Europe. We received responses from 1928 participants from 41 European countries, including 24 European Union (EU) Member States. Our results reveal substantial efforts in IAS monitoring and control, with invasive plants being the primary focus. Yet, there is a general perception of an increase in the numbers, occupied areas, and impacts of IAS across environment and taxonomic groups, particularly plants, over time. This perceived increase is consistent across both EU and non-EU countries, with respondents from EU countries demonstrating more certainty in their responses. Our results also indicate a lack of data on alien vertebrates and invertebrates, reflecting a need for more targeted monitoring and knowledge sharing between managers and policymakers and between countries. Overall, our study suggests that Europe's current strategies are insufficient to substantially reduce IAS by 2030 and hence to meet the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework target.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70028
JournalGlobal Change Biology
Volume31
Issue number1
Number of pages16
ISSN1354-1013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • environmental perception
  • exotic species
  • expert survey
  • invasive alien species
  • management practices
  • non-native species
  • policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Management Measures and Trends of Biological Invasions in Europe: A Survey-Based Assessment of Local Managers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this