Low-risk isn't no-risk: Perinatal treatments and the health of low-income newborns

N Meltem Daysal, Mircea Trandafir, Reyn van Ewijk

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We investigate the effects of perinatal medical treatments on low-income newborns who are classified as low-risk. A policy rule in The Netherlands states that low-risk deliveries before week 37 should be supervised by physicians and later deliveries only by midwives with no physician present. This creates large discontinuities in the probability of receiving medical interventions only physicians are allowed to perform. Using a regression discontinuity design, we find that babies born slightly before the week-37 cutoff are significantly less likely to die than babies born slightly later. Our data suggest that physician supervision of birth reduces the likelihood of adverse events such as fetal distress or emergency C-section. Our results indicate that low-income women benefit from receiving a higher level of medical care even if no explicit risk factors have been recognized, pointing to challenges in identifying all high-risk pregnancies. "Back-of-the-envelope" calculations suggest this additional care is highly cost-effective.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Health Economics
Volume64
Issue numberMarch
Pages (from-to)55-67
ISSN0167-6296
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1. Mar 2019

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Perinatal care
  • Prematurity
  • Mortality
  • Midwives
  • Birth
  • Medical treatments
  • Medical interventions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Low-risk isn't no-risk: Perinatal treatments and the health of low-income newborns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this